Joyanna Adams

Nobody's Opinion

Dear Mr. Simons….I Want What Your Drinking…

Nobody’s Opinion

One of my readers, sent me a very interesting article written by a Mr. Roger Simon, called, “Mind Your Own Beeswax!”: How Social Conservatives Can Win by Losing”

Mr. Simons’ main beef is about social conservatives and how they want to interfere in the lives of others, thereby being just as hypocritical as the left ( Read the article here.) –and that’s why the Republicans lost due to the women’s vote.

Oh my— blame it on those poor women. Those stupid Republicans need to be MORE hypocritical! single mother walking

Being a woman myself, I wondered how I got a such a whole other sense from the elections–so I am simply going to write a letter to Mr. Simon, because frankly, I think he has been watching too much CNN. ——–

Dear Mr. Simon

After reading your article “Mind Your Own Beeswax” : How Social Conservatives Can Win by Losing.”, I must admit, I had no idea that it was the women that voted in Obama. I’ve heard from several different sources that it was the Latino vote. I’ve also heard that Romney lost because the Ron Paul supporters stayed home. There is a good possibility that Obama won by fraud, because of the fact that Soros bought the main frame that tallies the votes in Spain. I’ve already posted proof of how easily that could be done.  Most people pick one or the other depending on their opinions on life, but the fact of the matter is, Obama  got less votes than he did 2008, and Romney had much more support than McCain, so what’s the real truth? You say, it’s because of the Republican’s stance on women’s social issues.

Mr. Simon,  I don’t recall Romney or any of the Republican candidates coming out and saying, “Yes, we must repeal Roe VS Wade, and all women should get back into the home and start having babies.” If you have a video of that somewhere I’d love to see it.

Nope.  It was the Democrats that put that fear into the hearts of all the young single women, (the married women voted for Romney) because they know how hard it is right now for these women.  They are having to raise the babies on their own, without another paycheck to help out, and on top of that, having to buy expensive Nike’s and cell phones, and pay for cable TV all by themselves simply because they can’t find a man to marry them, now can they?  An extra paycheck in this economy goes a long way.

And why can’t they find a man to marry them? Are you saying they see an advantage in being single?single mothers povertysingle mothers toll

It was the Democrats who MADE the women the issue, not the Republicans, who were playing pretty poor defense on the ‘women’s’ issues the whole time. It’s the liberals who think that young single girls must not be …what did Obama say? Be burdened withe a baby.  That’s right, a baby is a burden.

And in this economy, to a young single women, he’s right. Whew…the cost of diapers alone is enough to make you wonder if you will be able to afford paying that monthly IPHONE bill. After all, you NEED that phone to send baby pictures to all your friends!

Obama is giving women free condoms and abortions, so they can keep having sex, and still be able to use that what little money they are making at the Pizza place on basic necessities: Like buying new pumps, SUV’s, or IPADs. Is it any wonder that they vote for him?

Should the Republicans have offered free IPads to the girls? Why not just buy the votes like the Democrats..that would make more sense, then you can keep your conservative principles.

“For every single woman out there, who votes Republican, we will give her a brand new Ipod, Iphone, AND a $100 dollar certificate to Banana Republic!”

There, I just put the Republicans back in power. You’re welcome. But back to your article—

You said:  “The Right is guilty of its own kind of hypocrisy. It’s interesting how some of those who most vociferously object to government interference in our economic affairs are most desirous of government interference in our personal lives.”

Nobody Says: Okay. What Republican politicians actually said, that if elected, they would repeal the right to abortion? Romney said he would leave it up to the states I believe. That’s a far cry from some kind of draconian law of control. But I suppose you think passing a law that says we ALL have to pay for that single girl’s abortion is a very good idea. So far, I did not hear Paul Ryan or Romney say they were going to limit abortions. State some names on this sir…help me out.

You said: “Republicans will be the nanny for our private lives.”single mother graph

Nobody Says: HUH? Like I said, WHERE did you get this from? Obama will soon sign the Agenda 21 which will give the United Nations a right over YOUR child. You lose all parental rights. That’s about as private as you can get. Come on…fess up.  James Carvel is your second cousin…right?Carville & Gollum

You said; “Republicans have been losing the women’s vote for years and it is only going to get worse if we don’t take the social issues off the table and put them back where they belong, at home.”

Nobody Says: The only people who put social issues on the table this past election was the Democrats. They were the ones who used the mantra force of those “evil” pro-lifers, and the young single women were stupid enough to buy it. Once again… are you from MSNBC? What did I miss here?

You said: “The young vastly favor gay marriage. If you don’t think it’s going to be a fait accompli in the Western world in 25 years , you’re living in a cloud cuckoo land.”

Nobody Says: Yes, you support gay marriage. You have a RIGHT to support it, but not a right to force everyone else to . Ever wonder why? Because for the past 10 years, the American people have been hit daily with propaganda about “gay rights” and if they are Christians and don’t like it, they are labeled as EVIL.gays soldiers

So, you think because the left’s brainwashing has finally gotten the young people to accept it, every person who is against gay marriage, should just accept it too. After all,….the vote is in.

I guess you accept Obama’s death panels too?

You also say—“Marriage should be outside the government”

Nobody Says: Well…I agree…then the gays could get civil marriages. Why not? Let them pay big taxes too.  And hey, there are states now where they can go get married, right?

BUT…gay have rights already…so why in the name of “gay” should Christians Churches should be FORCED to perform gay marriages by  law? Or pay for abortions by force of law? And it’s the will of Obama to force everyone to bend to his private views.

If that’s not against liberty, than I don’t know what is. You’re a libertarian, right? What part of ‘liberty’ do you uphold? The L and the E?

The world has changed, and you are basically saying: Admit defeat….your conservative social morals are old and outdated and the women have arrived. Sacrifice your principle, for the good of my pocketbook.

Nobody Thinks that’s exactly why we will all be slaves. It’s in the communist plan (that all the leftist loonies use) to get rid of religion, AND the family…and then the state can control everything.

But..libertarians haven’t figured that out yet. Not that I stand for any party. ( I remain Independent.)

You letter makes sense, from a liberal point of view…You present it as pragmatic ( the young all accept homosexuals so that makes it democratically right) and women will have abortions forever ( so accept it  as a fact) but what you do NOT accept, is the liberty of religious people to have their own views on the matter.

And in that respect, you might want to check..I think you might be a closet democrat.cool-carved-pumpkins-3

So…let me get this straight: The nation is now filled with fatherless children, and women who can’t afford too many kids, so abortions needs to stay legal, and conservatives should just get off the “social” subject, admit defeat, and get to fixing the economy, even though the taxpayers will be PAYING for all these women and children food and housing, etc, AND abortions and contraception’s on top of it?

And if we did, Republicans would start winning?

I want what you’re drinking, Mr. Simon….I think they call it a Libertarian Zombie..

Am I right? Or…are do you live in Colorado?

December 3, 2012 Posted by | American Culture, liberals, Presidential Election 2012, Republicans, Uncategorized, Women's Rights | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Do American Women REALLY Suffer? Try Asking the American Man

Nobody Wins—

When the Republicans are always on defense.  (I had a busy day…sorry I’m late.)

Ahhh…here we go again: Remember when Obama threatened that if we didn’t pass his stimulus plans or raise the debt limits, or pass his health care plans, then: (1)  No one would get any of their social security checks,(2) veterans would not get paid (3) women would die in the streets without birth control (4) Republicans would poison our water and air, and (6) American Idol would be canceled.

Okay, so he didn’t threaten to cancel American Idol. After all, they put pictures of him up there all the time….but he might have to shut down the internet if we keep complaining. The point is every time this man wants something, he threatens doomsday scenarios. The “war on women” that the Democrats launched, is a joke. Women aren’t dying, and they have it better now than they have ever had it. More women are graduating college, more women have more rights. Where in the world is Obama coming from?

He just makes this stuff up.

Today it was the single women he was trying to scare by sending out his attack dog Hilary. (Oh no, not another one.) He needs the black’s vote and the single women votes, and anyone else who is getting food stamps.  The rest of us are already sick of him.

He’s continuing his rich VS poor communist strategy  hoping to point out that Mitt Romney’s wife is a rich woman, who unlike all the rest of you poor single women who HAVE to work, is married to a rich man, and even though she has five sons (and had breast cancer and MS) somehow her life is really easy, unlike his wife Michelle who is having such a tough time taking vacations all over the world.

Obama wants you to be angry about her life being so easy. Presidents never say these things themselves, (Republican Presidents do the same thing.) so Obama brought out his advisor…Hilary Rosen…to inform everyone that Mitt’s wife is spoiled.

***

They want you to think Obama was not involved in this.  (Giveaway…It was the first thing Jay Carney said today:  “I don’t know what he thinks about this.” at the morning press conference.

Oh sure. Right.

Ahem: Like many “women” who are at home, for some odd reason, a reason that most feminists who either don’t have kids, or have nanny’s who watch their kids, can’t seem to fathom–and like Mitt’s wife— I had things to do today. I did not have a glorious government job to go to…no, I had other things to do that I didn’t get paid for.  Therefore I didn’t have the time either to “tweet” or “blog” a response to Hilary Rosen’s “tweet” attacks on Mitt’s Romney’s wife. The “She never worked in her life” subject was headline news on every radio station, every television station, and probably somewhere in another galaxy.

While the more important news of North Korea launching missiles at us!! Was…uh…not so important.

This was just another creative  democratic well-planned attack war to get us all talking about what Obama wants us to be talking about–women. And to a Democrat, all women should work and give their kids totally over to the government to raise. God forbid they stay at home and make cookies.

Michelle came out right away and tweeted an all women deserve respect,” and then we saw clips of Obama saying, “We didn’t have the luxury for Michelle to not work.” –showing you the well-coordinated machine in work. They make their point: hit hard below the belt than come out and say “Oh..that’s not what we meant…oh no.” And to prove it they send in the “good” cop.

Today it was Axelrod.

“I could not disagree with Hilary Rosen any more strongly, her comments were wrong and family should be off-limits. She should apologize.” Jim Messina, Obama Campaign Manager “Also disappointed in Hilary Rosen’s comments about Ann Romney. They were inappropriate and offensive.” David Axelrod, Obama campaign advisor “families must be off-limits on campaigns.”

Obama repeated that message: “Family should be off limitsafter he makes the attack on Mitt’s wife.

Brilliant, you must admit.

Following the interview, Rosen herself tweeted, “I’ve nothing against @AnnRomney. I just don’t want Mitt using her as an expert on women struggling $ to support their family. She isn’t.”

Nasty. And tell me, what makes her such an expert? She’s rich and not struggling either, how does she know?

Now…while the conservatives think they won this argument today, they should think again. The Obama’s personally came out ”sympathetic” and then, like the idiots we have witnessed for too many years, FOX news put on Barbara Bush to defend her.

BIG Mistake.  Anyone would have been better than Barbara Bush.

Once again…Barbara came off as the “rich” person who instead of making sound remarks about the issue, was defending the “rich” habit of giving money away…and how much money she has given away, and how her husband always made a good living…and also Mitt’s wife has given away..yada yada,  yada..playing right into Obama’s hand the main points that, they ARE very rich snotty Republicans.  We’re very glad you’re nice, and sweet, and give to charities even though you’re rich Barbara, but that’s not the issue.

What she should have said was that since Obama has wreaked the economy so badly, teachers are being laid off. (A point Jay Carney kept bringing up). Teachers are being laid off because of the democratic unions. Mothers are suffering because they can’t pay the high inflationary cost of food and gas because of Obama tripling our deficits, and not producing a budget, and handing out money like a criminal who just stole an American Express card with no limit.

Is what he is doing criminal? You bet.  

You know, the more the Bush’s appear in public, the worse it’s going to be for Mitt. It’s bad enough that he is carrying the “Bush’s” mantle. Obama was voted in because of the unhappiness with the BUSH  dynasty…don’t they get that? Too many Americans, it’s not much different from the Russian people not wanting Putin back in office. The Bush Family, we found out, are the Rockefeller branch of the party that most of the conservative Americans don’t want to see again, and every time they pull out the Bush’s when Mitt’s in trouble, it’s going to hurt him.
****

Now, I know that it’s only human nature to want your children’s children to continue in the “public service” occupation of ruling the nation…but it’s NOT American. And like the Russian people, we are tired of dynasties. Even the nicer ones. Go home you guys. Let him win his own race.

In the meantime, the Democrats ran a black President (that you can’t criticize because of the color of his skin, and who just sent out a “gay” Democratic attack dog, who you can’t criticize because Hilary has a lover named Elizabeth, and two twins.

The democratic party is the party of threats…and if that doesn’t work, they use the children card, the race card, the gay card…the “pity the black, women, gay, underdog” ….whatever it takes to keep their power. They are now a Marxist/Socialist party trying to run as Jesus’s Christ’s party.

So, you want to know if the women really have it that bad in America like Obama is saying?

Just ask the American man…he’ll tell you the real truth.

April 12, 2012 Posted by | Barack Obama, Uncategorized, Women's Rights | , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 91 other followers

%d bloggers like this: