Last week’s standoff in Nevada, was a perfect example on how communists, or as Van Jones likes to call himself, progressives, plan to take over, and control the world. Just about everybody knows that a few hundred cattle are not going to kill of a turtle species, but that’s how the left intents to “take” over the world: with eco-green ‘energy’ that all of them will make a lot of money off of.
The turtle needs to be saved, but the cow, farts. It’s gotta go. So what if it feeds the world? They don’t want it, and they don’t want you to be able to eat hamburgers and drink milk…that’s only for them…like Obamacare.
They are doing this for our own good.
It’s not the first time a group of men have tried to take over the world, but listen to Van Jones explain, that they have to ‘change’ America in little steps. Those little steps add up. Actually, they have managed to take over our schools, and universities with hundreds of little steps. And Michelle Obama is now telling us what she WANTS us to eat. She has even changed McDonald’s menu, and her demands have cost billions of dollars to everyone in the food industry.
Make no mistake, that’s no little step.
Little steps. How many little steps have been taken to get rid of religion and the family? How many little steps have been taken to knock out small businesses? For that matter, how many BIG steps have been taken to fortify wealth into just a very few hands?
The idea of a few men running the world is nothing new. Just by accident, a few weeks ago, I came upon a book that contained, the “Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion.” If you search the internet, you will never in a hundred years find out where this piece of work came from, but one thing you will learn when reading it, is that men (And let’s be frank here, the Jews aren’t the only ones) have been trying to figure out how to control the world since before the floods.
For instance, in Protocol No 1
“it must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorization, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare.”
I don’t agree with this at all…it seems to me the world over, that most people just want to be left alone. Most people are good, and the proof of that is the fact that we all drive on the right side of the street. Now, if you take this as describing Obama, I’d say he hit it right on. ..but imagine Van Jones saying this: “All men are harming the planet for their own selfish reasons, therefore only people like me should rule.” This gives them the right in their minds to be…ruthless pigs.
“Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one’s party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority.”
Okay, they call this liberalism; Name the enemy first. The GOP are racist, misogynists, who will let you drown after a tsunami (one of Van Jones favorite images) and therefore elect the democrats! So they did, and you gave them power…to crush you.
“The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down ruler from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim, (Nobodies) but we must in no wise be guided by them. “
The democrats I think have this philosophy tattooed on their foreheads, with invisible ink. Obamacare will kill millions…it’s not moral, and yet, they passed it on Christmas Eve. Can’t get more immoral than that. They don’t care, it’s about control, and wealth.
“On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. “
Can you say, Harvard, Yale, (Van Jones went to Yale, hard to believe isn’t it?) Oxford?
Anyway, that’s just Protocol No. one. There’s 24 of them. And they mirror what is happening today in the elites halls of ‘progressives’ from both parties. You have to wonder if they don’t put a copy on their pillow at night at all the top hotels.
The Obama still have two more years to “fundamentally change America” and today, we saw another shooting: a “Nazi” shot some Jews here in America. Guns is top on the lists.
Their agenda has been clear: Control—. Of the internet, of your health, your energy consumption, how much money you are allowed to make, how long you will be allowed to work, and how many cows can walk on your ranch. Oh, and don’t have kids. Be gay and adopt. We’d like that.
Glenn Beck exposed Van Jones for what he was…he was an avowed communist. So poor Obama had to get him another job. Now you can see him on Crossfire on CNN where he can take the illiterates of his generation…down to tyranny. Step by step.
Am I worried about Van Jones?
Ha. Nobody watches CNN…now if he gets on FOX…
“Some even believe we are a part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.”
– David Rockefeller from his book, David Rockefeller: Memoirs.
“We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”
– James Warburg (Rothschild Banking Agent 1950)
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” – David Rockefeller
Are you ready to rumble? Are you ready for the New World Order? Yeah, me either.
I watched an excellent educational program on the History Channel last weekend called, “The Men Who Built America.” It was all about John Rockefeller, Dale Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan. They were the ‘titans’ of capitalism, and they created the biggest monopolies on the planet—-but they did build the country. They were ruthless in their business, and it was all about winning, being the richest, having the most monopolies—-and they competed against each other with almost malevolent passion. But it was competition that helped build the America we know: Rockefeller’s gas, J.P. Morgan’s electric, and Carnegie steel.
Under these men, the workers worked for pittances. During the Industrial revolution, men worked long hours, lived in poverty, and the gap between the rich and the poor was great.
Then along came Henry Ford. He gave his men higher wages, decent hours, the assembly line, and bought the age of prosperity to America. He wisely knew that the more cars he sold the better it was for everybody. While the titans of Rockefeller and Carnegie believed in crushing all competition, Ford thought competitions was a good thing. Pretty soon, all the companies were copying his model of business. The middle class was built. The 20th century was America’s glory.
And then, Teddy Roosevelt, a man that all three of the Titans were afraid of, became President, and government actually broke up Standard Oil into many companies— but Rockefeller had shares in every single company that Standard Oil was split into and became even richer.
J.P. Morgan had so much money, he once bailed out the government..thus forever bonding Wall Street and the government to serve each other forever.
And if you don’t think the Wall Street of today, rules the country, all you have to remember is how President George W. Bush bailed out Wall Street. (With OUR money)
I was surprised (although not shocked ) to learn that while the three titans of old fought and did horrible things to each other in business, that didn’t stop them from working together to buy an American Presidents. They just did it. They planned it out, than each gave millions to William McKinley and he won. He left them alone. Rockefeller even went over McKinley’s speeches.
You don’t have to be smart to realized, that our Presidents, and our Congress are still elected by power and money. They decide WHO goes on the tickets…whenever possible.That’s called, sorry to report: A plutocracy.
We have Oligarchs too.
Now we are in the 21st century, and we find ourselves back in the same hole we were before. The gap between the rich and poor grows bigger every day. We have two economies, the stock market where the rich play their global stocks, and the ‘service’ economy, where the disappearing middle class exists. American manufacturing has been transferred to other countries, like China. Whether our Titians moved their companies because of the high taxes or because they just see a bigger market, hardly matters to the us now. But in the 21st century we have 500 titans, instead of 3, and if the 20th century was all about America, the 21st is not about America at all.
It’s about global multinational companies and their dividends.
It’s why Bush was always warning us about isolationism, and Obama is shocked that Putin is actually working for his country. Nationalism is not supported by ANY of the big 500 countries. Their plans are to get into those countries and make money. They like to think they are building a better world, but it’s obvious what they have done.
They have REALLY screwed it up. There may be more “middle’ class in China, but it’s still a communist country. And they like communism. They really do. It’s much better for the bottom line. All you need to buy off is one man, instead of hundreds. It saves money.
Our modern day J.P. Morgan was Mitt Romney and he really was no different than Obama on policy. He believed in cap and trade, amnesty, abortion rights, and universal health care. The only difference was he was a money guy. Obama only knows how to spend money, not make it. But if debt is a prerequisite for the New World Order, than Obama was the perfect pick:
“The one aim of these financiers is world control by the creation of inextinguishable debts.” – Henry Ford, Industry Giant
So, you and I , the ones who don’t WANT to become global citizens, are slowly being programmed. The politicians are so much in the global multinational pockets that they got the Supreme Court to pass that “companies are people” who have a right to your property, but maybe not people enough to not obey Obamacare…because universal healthcare is the globalists (which are liberals and rinos’ ) agenda. (Watch carefully what happens to Hobby Lobby.)
That’s why the Rino’s won’t ever repeal it. That’s why BOTH parties said Ted Cruz shut down the government. He didn’t…THEY did. But look how they can twist the truth.
That’s why patriotic American “nationalists” are attacked by both parties. It’s been on the agenda for a looooooooooog time. American, has to be downsized. The New World Order is NOT a conspiracy.
Don’t believe me? Read their quotes here. Don’t be a fool, these men are working behind the scenes to bring this about. But unlike Rockefeller and Carnegie, who spent their own money, these titans are using our money to build it.
That’s why they need an internet tax, and a cap and trade tax. They want to keep their vast fortunes.
The NSA is just enough about multinational spying, as government spying. ( I don’t believe them when they say they don’t do it, do you?) We have blurred into an almost obscene fascism, where information is sold by the internet companies on where you shop, and the government sells YOUR information to the companies.
America is being transformed to fit into their global corporate government, where only the individual who works for the company will get his ideas on the market. All patents must be owned by the monopoly.
In the mean time, so we don’t get what’s up…they keep our eyes on the lost Boeing 777.
It’s lost. Or was it shot down? Or is it in a bunker? There is so much misinformation about it all, what can any of us believe?
While I’m pretty depressed tonight about the future of our country, I do know one thing…history has shown that even in the darkest hours, some do rise up, and miracles do happen.
Can David’s beat the Goliaths of the world? Yep.
“I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Government, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship – and those plans are there!” – Congressman Ron Paul at an event near Austin, Texas on August 30th, 2003
“I hope there is not another Cold War,” Clinton said during the question and answer portion of an appearance in Montreal. “Obviously, nobody wants to see that. I think that is primarily up to Putin.” —-Hillary Clinton, 2014.
“We’re hoping that Russia will not see this as sort of a continuation of the Cold War. We don’t see it that way. We do not believe this should be an East-West, Russia-United States – this is not Rocky IV, believe me,” Kerry said, referencing the 1985 movie.—John Kerry, 2014
Our approach as the United States is not to see these as some Cold War chessboard in which we’re in competition with Russia,” Obama said. “Our goal is to make sure that the people of Ukraine are able to make decisions for themselves about their future, that the people of Syria are able to make decisions without having bombs going off and killing women and children … because a despot wants to cling to power.” Barack Obama
Funny isn’t it? Here we have three top democrats who think that just by saying: “Hey, we can’t go back into the cold war Putin…we already did that!” That Putin will just say, “You’re right. “
That’s what you get when you put people in power whose total foreign policy achievements between the three of them amount to just how many secret service people they could find a hotel for when they vacationed on Martha’s Vineyard.
But.—-the cold war is back, and Nobody Remembers this speech that Barry Goldwater gave on the Senate floor, July 14, 1961, when JFK was President.
Here’s a few excerpts about the last “cold war” with Russia, and a few nobody comments.
“As I study the address delivered by the distinguished chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, I find myself becoming first surprised, then amazed, and finally, alarmed. In essence it strikes me as an argument of continued drifting in the wrong direction: for inaction on all major cold war fronts: For future costly implementations of an outmoded, weak- kneed foreign policy which accomplishes nothing but more and greater losses of freedoms’ territory to the forces of international communism. It is a plea for more useless expenditures in the name of more hopeless objectives. It is part and parcel with the prevalent belief in administration circles that all we have to do is increase the foreign aid budget and Khrushchev will back off. Castro will be rendered ineffective, and a tremendous host of nations will quickly effect social and economic reforms and clasp the United State to their bosom as the savior of underdeveloped areas.”
Nobody Notes: Isn’t this Obama’s whole foreign policy? Give everybody money? Be “nice”?
How many billions has he sent to the Middle East? And now he wants Congress to send billons to the Ukraine, which will end up in Russia, because the Ukraine owes Russia billions, and either way you look at it, that money ends up in Russia. How smart is that? It’s the same game plan that the democrats had back in 1961. He goes on:
“And the way things are going I am beginning to wonder whether it will ever come—those in official capacity in this country will have to stand up and tell the American people why it is that this approach to the realities of the cold war has cost us billions and billions of dollars while communism continues to gain, both in prestige and territory. The plan fact is that this is not a way to meet effectively the challenge of the cold war. It is the way to weaken freedom by draining our strength and undermines our economy…
“What pleases them (Russia) is our present policy of making costly commitments throughout the world, commitments which carry with them no element of real strength, but which rest on theoretical dreaming that the way to fight Communist bullets is with relief packages, Communist tanks with plows, Communist bombs with elaborate charts for monetary reform.”
Obama is a true liberal, and the way of the progressives. He thinks just because he himself believe the world should now be over guns, and wars, it will be. And if we just send rebels weapons to fight with, food to nourish them, and money for their leaders, everything will work out okay.
Evidently he was playing golf on 9/ll.
Barry’s Goldwater’s speech was about how even in a cold war, you should insist, and fight, for victory, and he cites a quote from General MacArthur who insists we have the RIGHT to prosecute war for the purpose of winning.
The best that might be said for the policy makes responsible for these monumental blunders is that they did not comprehend the truism, as old as history itself, that a great nation which voluntary enters upon war and does not fight it through to victory must ultimately accept all of the consequences of defeat, that in war…there is no substitute for victory…..
Putin is playing to win….and Obama..
Is concentrating on March Madness.
How can we not lose?
The big headline today: Vladimir Putin is taking back the Ukraine, and the rich western elites, who are busy enjoying their ski vacations in Snow Mass and Switzerland, are going to have to call a meeting, because, gee…what are they going to do?
They thought Putin would accept his place in the world, and now, they are afraid. Obama dismantled the missiles that protected Europe and destroyed our military, downsized NATO, and has left the middle East open to the Muslims Brotherhood, and doesn’t even seem concerned about Europe, or Putin.
At the emergency meeting of ambassadors from the 28 Nato member states, it was said: “Russia must stop its military activities and its threats.” The United States dramatically intensified pressure on Moscow, threatening to remove Russia from the G8 club of developed economies
There is a dirty little secret .shssssssssss. You might have figured it out by now, maybe…but frankly, because I watch the same cable networks as everyone else, it really didn’t dawn on me either, until I read this today:
The article was called Russian’s New Icon: (Time Magazine, November 9, 1998) Remember—by 1998 Russia had been defeated by Ronald Reagan, and Yeltsin the great American backed puppet, was a drunk, and so a man named Primakov became Prime Minister.
The Afghanistan war had depleted Russia of men and money, and the great Ronald Reagan saw an opportunity to defeat Russia when they were at their weakest, and he did. Russia broke up into little pieces.
Here’s the paragraph that struck me:
Though he seems every inch a disciplinarian, Primakov has not yet been able to shake the new government into shape. Ministers contradict one another in public. They unnerve the markets and the IMF with widely varying figures for the amount of new money that will have to be printed to keep the economy afloat.
Primakov cannot wave Russia’s current disaster away. Wages have to be paid on time, even if the government still cannot afford payment of back salaries for a while. the Nations’ idled factories have to start production again, even if they are not producing anything of great quality.
Sound familiar? This is what an American reporter was saying about Russia. Now, close you’re eyes, and that is America, 2014.
Now…we don’t get the real news from the world here in America. Sure, we have our internet, but FACEBOOK keeps most people occupied with their favorite dog picture. To the rest of the world, America has already collapsed…and it happened in 2008. Bush had spent trillions in Iraq and Afghanistan, 9/11 destroyed the economy more, the rich guys played casino, and we could have recovered…but then the second blow, came. A radical Marxist was elected, and he put the final nail in any recovery.
So now the tables are turned: Putin…like Reagan, sees a weak nation, with a communist sympathizer as its’ President. He trumped Obama in Syria, and he has been playing his cards carefully, getting surrounding nations dependent on Russia’s energy, and so, he knows it’s time: He wants to reunite the old Russia.
And Nobody will stop him. Not Europe, not Obama. Nobody. Because, we just don’t have the money, or the will of the American people.
What does our President do with the news? He just goes about his day…as if it’s no big deal. After all, from Obama’s point of view, he probably thinks he would do the very same thing as Putin.
And so the above speech was taken by us, and the rest of the world as a joke. My favorite part was when Obama said that the Ukraine people have a
“Universal right to decide their own future.”
Wow, from the lips of a hypocrite. Yes, Obama stands for everything he thinks you’ll fall for.
Does Obama let the America people decide their own future? Hell no. These are just platitudes that he doesn’t believe in. Obama has almost complete control over the media, with just FOX and talk radio holding him to account, (which he recently tried to take over with the FCC) and he has managed to make all Americans who do not want to become Russia, or communist, look like uncaring, unfeeling and backwards fools.
On George Stephanopoulos today, the communist Van Jones, (who was working for Obama before he lost his job thanks to Glenn Beck) could not stop attacking the tea party and how it’s backward, and weak. Almost the whole hour was spent on attacking Americans. Russia didn’t get much attention.
But…Russia is rising.
It’s very obvious, that the rest of the world has already seen America, as no longer on the world stage. Even Britain ignored Obama when he wanted their help on Syria.
Yes, it’s a secret…kept from the American people daily, Why we have global warming to worry about. Snow is everywhere.
America cannot stand up to Russia, or anybody anymore. We have left, like Russia before us, Iraq and Afghanistan in defeat. (Not our men, our leaders) Trillions spent for nothing. Good men and women lost forever.
Simply because both Bush and Obama were afraid to look…mean. They cared more about their appearances in history, (and their global corporate connections) than the survival of the country.
Both should be tried for treason, but that’s just my opinion.
Whether our politicians did this on purpose, or if they were just too busy watching their portfolios it hardly matters now.
Can America come back? Sure. Anything is possible. Russia, like America, has an older population, but he has the clear advantage because his army will not be filled with gays, pregnant women, and held to impossible directions to not “hurt the enemy.”
When the communist that is your enemy starts looking more like a leader than the communist leader of your own country, then your ass truly is in deep water.
Or— Those With Big Bones, Hide Them NOW!
She’s Italian, she was raised Catholic, and she fits right into what I was going to talk about today. Her name is Liz Trotta. She is a contributing commentator on Fox News, and this morning her subject was…the Pope. People should stop picking on him, especially Rush Limbaugh, she said. She went on: Just because the Pope said that he knew and liked a lot of Marxists, doesn’t mean that he likes Marxism.
According to MS Trotta, the Pope sees the great misery and poverty in the world, and he is just doing what Jesus would do, what we all should do—- be concerned about the little children of this world growing up in poverty. (It’s the new progressive argument.)
I had just read a piece from Charles Krauthammer’s new book, “Things that Matter” called, The Mirror-Image Fallacy, (Time, Aug., 1983) in which the good psychiatrist explains the progressive concept of Solipsism, which says that everyone in the world is alike.
“Fundamentally, it is a radical denial of the otherness of others.” said Charles.
This philosophy —everyone in the world is the same, because we all sleep, drink, feel pain, get common colds etc, and therefore utopia could be reached if we just got the right system in place—is crazy. Nobody needs to suffer, they believe.
I hate to say this, but sometimes it’s what people leave OUT of their talking points that can really get you pissed off. (Obama does this every day.) In Liz’s great defense of the Pope, she forgot to mention that the Pope WAS attacking capitalism. Sorry Liz, that quite a big point to leave out.
h/t The Exchange:
The pope has gone a bit overboard, however, in his recent attack on free-market capitalism. In a lengthy “apostolic exhortation,” Pope Francis rails against “an economy of exclusion” and a “ financial system which rules rather than serves.” The pope points out that, in a time of miraculous technological progress, alarming numbers of people still live in misery and desperation.
“The culture of prosperity deadens us,” the pope writes. “We are thrilled if the market offers us something new to purchase; and in the meantime all those lives stunted for lack of opportunity seem a mere spectacle; they fail to move us.”
The pope has urged everyone from charities to Italian authorities “to do everything possible so that every family can have a house.” this holiday season.
Great idea! Hey, that Vatican is pretty big— just THINK of how many homeless families you could fit in that sucker.
According to the Pope, and the progressives, the only way to rectify this horrible injustice of people who have nothing, is to redistribute the bones…I mean the money, by force if we must. Both Obama, and now the Pope, and quite a few members of Congress are ready to implement…equality upon the world. Obamacare is just the start.
(John McCain would add the Ukraine, Japan, North Korea, the Sudan, Syria…..Mercury, the planet Venus…)
The world leaders are desperate in their compassion, are they not? Even Liz today was full of it. I was looking for the picture of the poor starving children walking barefoot in Rio to pop up behind her.
To the progressives, the only way to bring utopia to the earth is to take a bone from one dog, and give it to the other dog. Anybody who has dogs knows there WILL be a fight. Even the sweetest dog on the planet will bare her teeth and growl, protect that bone, even hide it, from the other dog. That is her bone, and NOBODY has a right to it. This happens every single morning in my house.
It’s dog survival 101.
And everybody knows the best way to lift people out of poverty is to let the people run their own lives, in free markets, without government interfering, and collect as many bones as they possible can. And that’s true capitalism. That was once the American Dream.
My subject today was going to be when did America stop believing in individual success? When did the American Dream turn into— America is greedy, selfish, and rich?
When did the man become less important than the collective? Even in sports, it’s the home-run that wins the games. While the collective can win at many things, true progress is made, in almost every instance, by the individual with a little help from his friends.
(Thank you Ringo)
I know when it happened in my life. The social conditioning started in 1st grade. If one bully hits a kid, and the kid sticks up for himself, BOTH kids are sent to the office. What can of justice is that? There is no justice.
It’s all about teaching that the children must obey and do what’s best for the collective.
If a bully in class damages something while the teacher is gone, and nobody in the class is willing to be beat up by the bully, they remain silent. The whole class will be punished for one man’s crime. I believe this is done in the military too.
Nobody Thinks the very insanity of blaming millions of white people now, for crimes of their ancestors of long ago, is no different than punishing the whole class for crimes none of them committed. We are…forever being conditioned to guilt. And the Catholics and politicians, are masters at it.
It’s one of the reasons a whole race of white people are silent now on the injustices being propelled on them, for crimes they didn’t even commit.
And why should such an intelligent woman such as Liz Trotta, ignore the obvious?. Has she no clue that she is suggesting we all stop buying I-Phones and start giving our money to countries all over the world?
( I don’t have an I Phone, but the black guy who just came over to fix my internet connection had two, which he got the old-fashioned way. He worked for them.)
Liz Trotta, we perhaps could say, is just a product of her Catholic upbringing, which never told her, there isn’t enough bones in the world to fix poverty, and who never pointed out to her, that politicians will go farther than a dog for their right to keep their bones: They hide them in offshore bank accounts while they take ours, which Nobody Thinks is an injustice we have been conditioned to accept.
And speaking of dogs: Today, Raul Castro issued a stern warning to entrepreneurs to not push the boundaries of the state. Nobody is to collect too many bones in Cuba..he is adamant.
I just hope our American doggie survival instincts kick in before it’s too late…and if not, we can always go back to the old Jesse James’ method.
You dig a BIG hole….
Good lord: The day Mandela of Africa died, everyone without exception had nothing but glorious praise for the man who did not hold his white jailers at fault for what they did to him. Most white people were ecstatic about that, since the white race is now considered some kind of continuing demonic race promoting apartheid. I’m sure it’s one of the reasons the rich white politicians made him a big star. (What? You think he did this all by himself? Just like Oprah? He had NO help whatsoever?)
NOW…millions of Americans, including this Nobody whose main information at the time on apartheid was a Stevie Wonder song, are finding out what Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher knew: Mandela was a communist. So the question is: Why,— when he got out of jail, was he such a nice guy? Why did he live in a predominantly all white rich neighborhood? Why was he casting himself as the next Gandhi?
Can a politician control his own image in history? Do they even WANT to?
Step outside: Can you see the sun? Do you want it to shine tomorrow? Of course you do.
Mandela did what Clinton, and Obama do every day: They do whatever is going to make them look good to the history books. They’ll even kill people to keep that legacy. (a future blog) Forgiving whites for jailing him, raised Mandela’s legacy to a whole other level…and that level was very profitably.
It’s all about the branding. It’s all about the money:
Following his death on Thursday at the age of 95, the scramble for control of the Mandela legacy – both financial and moral – will involve his family, the ruling African National Congress (ANC), and the Nelson Mandela Foundation he set up to protect his broader message.
At stake is the inheritance that will go to Mandela’s more than 30 children, grandchildren and great grandchildren, some of whom already use the Mandela name and image to market everything from clothing to reality TV.
—-And everyone wants to profit off that glorious Mandela brand. Obama is using it to up his own brand as the son of Mandela. Obama called Mandela in his speech today at the funeral, by his AFRICAN name. (Shouldn’t we honor Obama by calling him by HIS real name: Barry?)
Obama has a lot in common with Mandela. By all accounts, it seems Mandela was a full-fledged communist, most of his life— who studied Islam and hated British colonialism. Exactly what Obama’s early life was all about.
And though at first, Mandela’s prison time was hard…he really didn’t suffer as much as they want you to believe while he was in prison. For many years, he had a very nice life: had hundreds of visitors, got a degree…good food: Oh…he had a lot of time to father 30 children.
- Wow. He fathered his own tribe!
And yes, neither Obama or Mandela seen to have met a communist they didn’t like. Obama, made a big point at the funeral to walk up to Raul Castro and shake his hand with big smiles and kisses for the world to see. This wasn’t some kind of act of “forgive and live together” act. This was because Obama truly likes communism. So did Mandela. His best friends were Fidel Castro and Omar Gaddafi.
Obama killed Gaddafi. So THAT’s why Mandela refused to see him, but hey…do you really think his family, with all the money they are going to make off a President praising their father…Do you think they are going to say, “Obama killed one of Daddy’s best friends!”
We are seeing the groundwork being laid down for Obama’s legacy as the man who challenged the rich greedy white men of America, and put down the apartheid in this country. Forget about the uniting and ending of race in America, Obama has done nothing but fuel the hatred.
Yes… Obama and Mandela had a lot in common. The only difference being, Obama lead a pretty nice middle class life as an American citizen. Mandela…did not. Right now, most blacks in South Africa live on less than $2.00 a day. Mandela, as President, came in with all the right welfare programs, so what has changed?
The black people remain poorer than ever: BUT…they have black Gods now to worship who they know, somewhere, are sitting in multimillion dollar homes. For some odd known reason, they have been brainwashed to believe that that’s a GOOD thing. And that’s the biggest scam about communism: the leaders that promise the moon, end up taking it all for themselves.
As for Obama bowing to Raul Castro, (yes…it’s there…) while at the same time talking about political prisoners being held all over the world?
Who, may I remind everyone: is white.
Pope Francis has used his first major written work to attack capitalism as a “new tyranny,” while urging global leaders to fight poverty and inequality. In a document published Tuesday, Pope Francis denounced the ‘idolatry of money’ and “trickle-down” economic policies, as well as consumerism and a financial system which he says rules rather than serves. The Pope urged politicians to guarantee all citizens “dignified work, education and healthcare.”
This coming from a guy who gets money from the poor and lives in a house which has the biggest collection of art in the world, and probably has his own foot massager. I love a good hypocrite. Gee…another con job. And I thought this guy was going to be the real deal. (sigh)
I side with Mr. Adams who found the Catholic Church full of that very same ‘tyranny.” The Catholic people are poor, but the Vatican is not suffering. Maybe the Pope should practice what he preaches and sell off those Bernini’s so that Peru can have free health care.
I was thinking about the rich today, because I was reading about that very big capitalist, Ross Perot, in Forbes magazine.
True Confession: I voted for Ross Perot…twice. It was said that Ross was the reason Daddy Bush lost to Bill Clinton, and so, the Clinton’s will make sure that some third-party libertarian will run against whomever runs against Hillary, to assure her election, because that worked so well with Bill. It’s all getting rather boring and predictable, isn’t it? Having our Presidents picked years in advance?
The reason I like Perot so much, is that he kept trying to warn everyone about NAFTA, and CAFTA. What he called the sucking sound of America losing its jobs to other countries.
I really don’t think Perot is suffering after his defeat, and neither is Mitt Romney, because they are both what the Pope is talking about: capitalists— In fact, there is one thing both Ross and Mitt have in common: They know how to get the government to fund their big money-making projects and they use that free money from the taxpayers to further their empires.
From “Love That Giant Sucking Sound”, Christopher Helman, Forbes Magazine, Sept., 2013:
The Federal Aviation Administration came to the Perots (in Texas) says Perot Jr., “and asked us to donate land for an airport,” an industrial airport to be built with public funds.
Perot like the idea–and saw a greater opportunity. He convinced Fort Worth Mayor Bob Bolen and the city council of his grand plan. Perot would put up the land for the airport but only if Fort Worth agreed to pay for utilities and infrastructure, allow Perot to operate the airport and promise future tax abatements so he could lure in companies and develop yet more of his land.
Why settle for just an airport?
And this is how it works all over the United States: The billionaires get the ‘people’ to pay for the football stadiums, and malls, and on and on and their property taxes go up, and while jobs ARE created, the bulk of the money goes to….the billionaires.
Why do you think there are more than 500 big B’s on the Forbes lists? And when the Supreme Court gave big companies “personhood”, you have the mom and pop small business up against the Wal-marts. (I understand where the Pope is coming from, but he just doesn’t get it does he?)
The Perot airport has become the main industrial hub for the lower United States. Sharon Boyd, who tried to stop Perot getting public financing had this to say:
“He’s the ultimate welfare baby. He doesn’t do anything without subsides or tax rebates. He has a mentality that views the public sector as a fat pig that’s going to be slaughter anyway, so it might as well be by us.”
So…here’s where maybe somebody should get the Pope aside and ask him: You, dear sir, can fly all over the world BECAUSE men like Ross Perot build airports for your plane to land upon. Maybe you should think about that next time you take a tour.
Is it any wonder the Pope is complaining? Mom and Pop just don’t have the money any more to fork over to the church. Instead of blaming governments for giving handouts and sweet deals to billionaires friends, he is campaigning for communism. Think about that….Communism and the Church.
I can’t wait. Where’s my straw?
Thanksgiving is coming up…and every Thanksgiving, Rush Limbaugh tells the story of how the first people in the colonies were made to all work for the ‘company.’ In other words, they had to throw everything they grew into the pot to be spread around. And then Rush loves to explain–the real reason they could celebrate Thanksgiving: They switched to every man for himself, which was a precursor to…Adam Smith, and 349,000 golf courses! (just kidding.) —-capitalism.
So I thought, since I’m reading about early American history right now, I’d throw in some more of William Bradford’s own observations to best explain, WHY free enterprise works better than ‘communism’. What seems so cut and clear to many of us, has eluded our leaders.
Remember—-The first people in Plymouth were literally starving. selling their clothes, working for the Indians, eating nuts, crawling around on all fours looking for food…and according to Bradford —
So…they, being sensible people thought: Well…THIS isn’t working, and they changed the “experiment’…and the good William tells us how—
Enjoy…because REAL history, is being destroyed.
From “The Annals of America, Vol. One”
End of the “Common Course and Condition.”
All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still languish in misery.
At length, after much debate of things, the governor (with the advice of the chief among them) gave way that they should set corn, every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves: in all other things to go on in the general way as before. And so was assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportions of their number, for that end, only for present use and ranged all the boys and youth under some family. (Nobody notes: orphans)
This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the governor or any other could use, and saved them a great deal of trouble and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn, which before would allege weakness and inability, whom to have completed would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.
The young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work of other men’s’ wives and children without any recompense. The strong or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the others could: this was thought injustice. The aged and the graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors and victuals, clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men’s’ wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc. they deemed it a kind of slavery: neither could many husband well brook it.
God in his wisdom saw another course fitter for them.
God evidently has not touched his ‘wisdom’ on Barack Obama. People now…are getting tired of paying for the vast fraud and abuse that the welfare system is doling out to minorities, and illegal’s. We are no different from our ancestors.
And Obamacare, is the next great injustice. You would THINK they would learn from history.
Later on, when families started coming over, the governors gave them more land, and people got to keep their land, and without that nice little perk, we might never have had George Washington as our first President, because one of the big reasons he fought the British was for the rights to keep, and own his own property. (George had a LOT of land) Owning your own property was something which had already been established and enjoyed by King George’s subjects since Plymouth. The Crown wanted only loyalists to be able to own land. That’s like Obama telling everyone that only Congress can have their own medical insurance.
Nobody Thinks we need to remember the common course. It’s the tract to starvation, Detroit, more socialism, and in the end, death.
Nobody’s Note: On Bradford’s death, the historical manuscript was lost and disappeared from the colonies during the revolutionary war, but came to light in the library of the Bishop of London in 1855. The original manuscript was returned to the U.S. in 1897 and now lies in view at the State House in Boston.
(Maybe Debbie has seen it.)
Nobody Knows if Harry Reid planned for Obama to be speaking at the United Nations while Ted Cruz was speaking on the floor of the Senate all day, but since nothing is a coincident in politics, the democrats are hoping that people will be more interested in Obama’s speech at the UN, and Bill Clinton celebrity meeting at Bill Clinton’s yearly party for his big money-laundering organization known as the Clinton initiative.
All they had to do was get Brad Pitt to show up, and the masses would forget all about Ted.
Nobody Knows, just how many people were appalled, as I was, of George W. Bush coming out and sticking up for Obama playing golf. It’s almost as if he was sticking up for one of his kids. Really. I have always wondered if the Bushes, who seemed to be on the high top mark of the NEW WORLD ORDER, didn’t help put Obama in as President: It’s as if they didn’t want the republicans to be blamed for Universal Health Care. You know, history will blame the downfall of America on the token black guy.
Nobody Knows just how cynical one person can get…but I’ve been there for quite a while.
But think about what Dick is saying here: The Clintons are JUST as involved with the Muslim Brotherhood as Obama. Notice this announcement got NO press at all. None. Nada.
Personally—-I think the Bushes, the Clintons, and the Obamas’ are all in on the New World Order…and the next President has already been picked by the elite.
They still have to get gun control and amnesty. The Rhino’s and the Democrats are the same party now.
Only the people of the Tea Party remain. They are trashing Ted like they did Sarah. Karl Rove was even trashing Ted Cruz.
I was cleaning out some old paperbacks from a closet this morning when I found my college copy of Brave New World Revisited by the Brit, Aldous Huxley. For those of you who have never heard of the man, George Orwell was his student.
Within the next generation I believe that the world’s leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience.
Huxley had deeply felt apprehensions about the future the developed world might make for itself. From these he put forward some warnings in his writings and talks. In a 1958 televised interview conducted by journalist Mike Wallace, Huxley outlined several major concerns: the difficulties and dangers of world overpopulation; the tendency toward distinctly hierarchical social organization; the crucial importance of evaluating the use of technology in mass societies susceptible to wily persuasion; the tendency to promote modern politicians, to a naive public, as well-marketed commodities.
Whenever the economic life of a nation becomes precarious, the central government is forced to assume additional responsibilities for the general welfare. It must work out elaborate plans for dealing with a critical situation; it must impose ever greater restrictions upon the activities of its subjects; and if, as if very likely, worsening economic conditions results in political unrest, or open rebellion, the central government must intervene to preserve public order and its own authority. More and more power is thus concentrated in the hands of the executive and their bureaucratic managers. But the nature of power is such that even those who have not sought it, but have had it force upon them, tend to acquire a taste for more.
Huxley went on to say that when overpopulation becomes the norm, communism is a sure thing.
And so Nobody Thinks that our elites, who have studied at Harvard and Yale, are very aware of Aldous Huxley, and so you have to ask yourself;
According to Aldous Huxley, that way is sure communism.
I might have to read this book again.
Obama broke another historical record—He has now insulted his own country more times than any other president. He did it again in Mexico last week by telling the college students down there that if America wasn’t so messed up, there would BE no drug lords. And, the reason that the drug lords killed so many people in Mexico was because America makes their guns.
Put that Presidential insulting record right up there with being the first President to bow to foreign leaders: admit that he used to be a proud drug user (Nobody Thinks he still does cocaine, that’s just an educated opinion): bans religion in the military: claims full rights to kill or condemn any one he thinks fit, to prison without a trial: lowered the US credit rating for the first time: spent more money than all the Presidents before him combined: put all Americans on the path to state death panels: and oh yeah…he claims to be ALL black.
Scientifically that’s not a fact, but it gives him the protection of a politically correct god.
We saw the full extent of Obama’s big government America, at the Boston Marathon.
And yet, he had the audacity to say these things at the graduating class of The Ohio State University at Ohio Stadium on May 5, 2013 in Columbus, Ohio.
Let’s take this line by line—
Nobody: It’s true. And that’s why we keep saying it. Read history you dimwit.
Obama. Some of these same voices also do their best to gum up the works.
Nobody: What works? Obama wants to tell you when to die, where you can live, what you can eat, what your children can eat, who you can or cannot insult, and what car to drive. Where you can start your business, who can or cannot get loans, and who gets to come into the country.
You’d be a damn fool if you didn’t want to gum it up.
Obama: They’ll warn that tyranny always lurking just around the corner.
Nobody: It’s not just around the corner: it’s here. When a government takes away all your rights, it’s called tyranny, and it has the same meaning everywhere on the planet. Glenn Beck, the NRA, the tea party…are all law abiding, true Americans.
Obama: You should reject these voices.
Nobody: What he means is, anyone who didn’t agree to his dictatorship should be rejected. He is telling these kids to ignore Rush Limbaugh, FOX NEWS, Glenn Beck, and everyone who thinks government has grown too big.
Remember, here is a President telling you to not listen to other Americans. In a democracy, in a free country, all voices must be heard. If he believed in free speech, he would be telling you to listen to all voices, and make your own decision.
Obama: Because what they suggest is that our brave and creative and unique experiment in self rule is somehow just a sham with which we can’t’ be trusted.
Nobody: Since when is Obama’s brand of socialism/Marxism/fascism/communism, brave, creative OR unique? Oh it’s creative alright. He wants to combine every force of tyranny and mix it all up. Start out with a little socialism, throw in a lot of fascism, mix it up with dictatorial executive orders, and call communism: self-rule.
Where is the self-rule? He believe that the individual should cater to the collective. That’s communism.
There is only Obama rule, and he wants the dumb kids to think that since he is President therefore, he represents what the people want. That’s the lie. He is the lie.
Obama: We have never been a people who place all our faith in government to solve our problems. We shouldn’t want to. But we don’t think the government is the source of all our problems, either. (So, don’t expect the government to help you, but don’t criticize it when it doesn’t.)
Nobody: When you have more than 50 percent of the people working for the government, and when the government runs up a deficit of trillions that can never be repaid, keeping the future Americans enslaved for life, and THEN Obama wants to disarm all Americans, while having his own private army, I’d say that’s a big problem.
Obama: Because we understand this democracy is ours.
Nobody: It depends on what you think the definition of “ours” is. And if you think this democracy is ‘ours’ just try to tell your child’s teacher that you don’t want him to learn about gay sex in the first grade. You have no say in the matter. Obama’s democracy is his. It’s George Orwell: black is white, truth is a lie, and communism is democracy.
Obama: As citizens we understand that it’s not about what American can do for us, it’s about what can be done by us, together, through the hard and frustrating but absolute necessary work of self-government.
Nobody: Obama basically wants a chain gang. He wants ‘workers’ for his “self-government.” It’s his way or else, and he is King, he was born to be King, and blah, blah, blah. Sure this “self-government” is hard and frustrating because the rich, which is anybody with a job, will have to give whatever they’ve earn to Obama to redistribute to his other selves.
And in the meantime, he goes after the kids, because the older people are starting to finally wise up.
Nobody Thinks, Obama is going full force 1984. He thinks there are enough dumb kids out there who don’t know any better.
Let’s hope we get to them before he does.
(And I thought Bill Clinton was bad.)
Once again, the timing of the dedication of x-President, George W. Bush’s library, couldn’t have had come at a more propitious time. The nation had just been attacked by Muslim radicals, giving the Bush family a platform to remind us all, that Bush kept us safe throughout the rest of his Presidency after 9/11. And in this light, it was okay for George himself to push for another Bush in the White House: His brother, Jeb.
As I watched the former Presidents all standing, and then the speeches, I can’t say that any one of them talked about what THEY had done for our country. It was all about how they, while doing the ‘toughest’ job in the world…changed the world, and plan to keep on doing it.
Not much about helping America. No mention of the hard times we are going through now.
I posted Jimmy Carter’s speech, simply because to me, what all of the former Presidents seem to be most proud about is what they have accomplished in other countries. That’s all they bragged about in all their speeches. According to the former Presidents, Bush’s best legacy was his work on aids in Africa. Clinton, Carter, and Obama all mentioned it.
George W. himself continued his great theme of globalization. America’s future is to spread democracy around the world. Never mind that since Bush and Obama, the trillions of American dollars spent to spread democracy around the world has not done a damn thing but strengthen more tyrants and America haters abroad, and destroyed the economy at home.
The theme of Bush’s library is freedom. But…while he dreams of spreading freedom all over the world, in America, the citizens continue to lose theirs.
The Bush doctrine is that only in freedom will democracy flourish, while true and noble….it makes no sense to a religion based on anything BUT freedom. All the children of Islam are brainwashed before they start to walk. I guess Bush thinks sometime 3,000 years from now, the world’s population of Muslims will decide to vote for someone who goes against everything they’ve learned from birth, and will thank George Bush for saving them from poverty and giving them democracy.
Frankly, I don’t see it happening.
Nobody Thinks that the reason all these Presidents have to praise themselves on how what they personally did to further and help the world is because none of them have down a damn thing to help Americans. All of them are too busy helping the rest of the world. Globalization may make good speeches and wonderful ideas for American Presidents who build multi-billion dollar museums to themselves and keep their own families working forever, but they all just become another part of the 1 percent that live among the rich and famous. The Presidential museums will be the last remaining things standing if we keep on this “We will fix the world” path.
George W. Bush comes off as a very sweet and likable man, but so does Bill Clinton. But, they were paid to work for America…not to eliminate poverty all over the world because it makes them feel better about themselves. (Or helps out big corporations who want into the global markets.) We must not judge Presidents on how much we like them as people, but on what they have done for us. And let’s be frank: None of them can be considered great.
So, when Bush started crying at the end of his speech— when he said the future of America will be great…a lot of us felt like crying with him. Everyone said he was crying because of all his friends. But to those watching, he was crying because America might never recover, and he knows it.
Personally, I don’t think Bush is that dumb.
Instead of talking about what they have all done for America, all they could talk about is how much money they sent out to the rest of the world. It’s enough to make you mad. And we still have good men dying in Afghanistan.
After the ceremony, I came across this video of Daniel Hannan, explaining how Margaret Thatcher took a dying England and brought it back to life. It’s what we need here. A President that takes care of his country: FIRST.
That’s what we should have heard today: George W. Bush could have brought America’s strength back. Instead, he choose his own course of “saving the world.”..and because he chose the wrong course, the communists, came forward.
George…you broke my heart.
You know, maybe our “Presidents” should just start building their libraries in Africa, and Iraq, and all over the world. And I apologize tonight to anyone who feels I’m too cynical about them all, because frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn about any of them.
And I will spend the rest of my life, trying NOT to remember the years I spent feeling betrayed, by each and every one of them.
Imagine my surprise when I saw this book at my local library…displayed for all to see:
Spreading the Wealth: HOW OBAMA IS ROBBING THE SUBURBS TO PAY FOR THE CITIES
It was published right before the 2012 election, and if I had read it back then, or ANY body had bothered to read it when it came out (like Mitt Romney) all they had to do was point out the many plans that Obama had going on in the background away from the American eyes, and he might have lost.
Which makes me wonder if the books were just NOW delivered to the libraries.
Stanley Kurtz, explained in this book, the Common Core educational system that Obama is now putting into place with the help of the Bill Gates Foundation. He tells you that Common Core basically federalizes all schools, taking local control out of every state and city, but did it in such a way as to bypass the Constitution.
He uses the “carrot” of stimulus money.
But that’s not the most alarming thing in the book. Here’s where the real transformation of America is going to come to fruition:
“The problem is that Obama’s actual interest in the suburbs lies in redistributing their tax money to the cities stripping suburban municipalities of their right to self rule, and forcing suburbanites to move back to town. Obama is aiming to fleece suburbanites of their hard earned income over to the cities.”
It’s called regionalism. And Obama has been in this business with his former cronies from Chicago (Alinsky) building up to this moment. He kept it stealth. But we are going to see it come about very soon.
“The regionalist program for gradually doing in the suburbs has three main components 1) Redistribute suburban money to the cities 2) Force middle class suburbanites back to the city. 3) Force the urban poor out into the suburbs.
The day after I starting reading this book, much to my surprise, the three (4-year) term white city Mayor of St. Louis, Francis Slay, had just gotten elected to a whopping 4 more years. And he won over two black men So why did a predominantly black district elect a white man again?
Slay had the big democratic guns behind him: In addition to labor, Mayor Slays political support included the likes of Malik Ahmed, MO State Rep. Karla May, Jim Buford, Sable Jones, MO Governor Jay Nixon, Robbie Montgomery of Sweetie Pies, U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill, Earline Bell, businessman Tony Thompson, Rev. Earl Nance, Jr., MO State Senator Jamilah Nasheed, Angela Miles, Sal Martinez, Greg F.X. Daly, Lou Ford, Bob Kelley, Shameen, and Rodney Hubbard, Jr., MO State Rep. Penny Hubbard and Rodney Hubbard, Jr., Ted Williams, J. Kim Tucci, Alderwoman Tammika Hubbard, Secretary of State Jason Kander, Aldermen Shane Cohn, and Jennifer Florida; Joe Edwards, and Peter Sortino…(the list goes on)
In his acceptance speech…his big plans? Merge the country and the city by 2020. (I heard it on the news, but I can’t find it now on YouTube)
But he talks about it here, although he cleverly hides the fact that the people will not elect these representatives:
Not too long ago, in the St. Louis area, the county AND the city were asked to pay for a tax increase to ‘fix our parks.” They sold it on “We will fix up the Arch grounds.” I voted against it, there is nothing that the Arch needs, but it passed…of course. ALL tax hikes pass in St. Louis.
Amazing isn’t it?
This redistribution has been going on long before Obama. It’s what Fannie and Freddie housing collapse was about. So, we have to assume that George W. Bush was on board with this social engineering program, because he was out promoting it too.
I used to live in a predominately white neighborhood, and when Clinton got elected, the schools in the city started shutting down, and the black kids were all shipped out to the white suburbs. Our property taxes went sky high, and basically the democrats socially engineered a whole proportion of blacks out to the suburbs.
Down the street was a community mall with lots of local shops that made the whole neighborhood feel like middle class. Now, that mall is filled with government agencies and a community school where blacks all get free educations. The stores, (hundreds of them) are gone. Socialism is not a pretty sight.
Mayor Slay would LOVE to get his hands on St. Charles taxes, but so far they have resisted. And what has happened to St. Louis, a democratic city? All our business have vanished. Like Detroit…they leave waste lands. So, tell me why they keep getting reelected? Is it any wonder that they want to raid the money of the people in the suburbs?
The liberals have ruined our schools. In the next four years the rest of the plan, of complete redistricting money to the “poor’ will be complete.
Democrats will rule by a sort of soft communism…once this happens.
The book explains Obama’s visions, and the fact that this hasn’t gotten out until now, shows you that they already have this redistribution plan in full motion.
So, Nobody Thinks everyone should read this book. I don’t know where you live, but maybe if enough people are warned, it won’t happen to you.
That is…if you can find it.
Like most Americans, I’ve been listening to wall-to-wall coverage of the bombings in Boston, and as usual, scouting the websites for varying opinions…from the Alex Jones version of “FBI maybe setup this action” to the ongoing almost nauseating coverage of how brave Bostonians are…as Carl Sagan so rightly points out in his books, it’s best to take most things, even politics with as much skepticism as possible: So here’s a few Nobody’s Opinions:
1. The FBI we have found out, could have prevented this if they had listened to Russia, but what happened? Personally, I think, simply by listening to Obama’s own philosophy on Muslims in America and his reaction to the Ft. Hood shootings— it’s the Obama administration that is holding back the FBI from doing their job. When I reported suspicions in my own neighborhood, the Chief of Police was very protective of my Muslim neighbors and told me to leave. The FBI agent, on the other hand, took me seriously, and then told me short of my seeing them load a bomb into the back of their vans, there was absolutely nothing he could do about them. Hazelwood, the city I live in, is a very democratic stronghold.
2. Throughout Benghazi we saw Hillary Clinton and Obama make statement after statement condemning a video that insulted Islam. That held priory over the attack and murder of our own citizens. Even at the funerals, Hillary was telling the grieving relatives, “We will punish the man who made the video.” The White House has let the matter go.
3. Obama has had the Muslim Brotherhood welcomed into the White House for the first time in history. He has opened the visa’s once again for Muslims to flood into our country. He has given speeches about Islam being peaceful, and America being the biggest Muslim nation–his political correctness goes beyond sanity.
In other words, it is Obama that is putting America in danger. The facts all point to that.
4. While the lock down of Boston, by all logical reasoning, seemed very necessary, the precedent it sets is alarming. To have tanks, and big thugs carrying real machine guns— having all those forces roaming the city streets, and having a shoot-out right in the neighborhood, should leave Americans gasping. While we heard all the regular, “Our police and military are great!” speeches, is this the future? Every time some guy goes wacko our cities will be filled with tanks to ‘protect’ us?
When will the tanks be brought out in Chicago? And despite all the money, equipment, and technology, the person who found the guy was a lone citizen who made a simple phone call.
I don’t know how many soldiers, cops, and FBI were in Watertown, but I wonder if all the people of Watertown will give up their freedom to be protected by the vast military complex that the Democrats seem to enjoy.
Yes…the Democrats will bring out the big guns before the Republicans will. Funny isn’t it? No it’s not, when you know that it is their policy to disarm Americans, and let the state protect you.
Let’s not forget, Bill Clinton’s action in Waco, and Janet Reno sending in the military in the middle of the night to send a poor immigrant child back to Castro. Can you even imagine George Bush doing that?
If a Republican had ordered this massive buildup in Boston, or stealing a child in the night by gunpoint, the Democrats would have been screaming.
Clearly, we can assume that the Democrats have no qualms of building Obama’s army…to “protect” us all.
As for Alex Jones and others listening to the mother saying the boys were used by the FBI..that is absurd. Islam and even the moderates that are Muslims, believe that everyone who is an infidel should be killed. She, by all accounts was lying.
It IS in their religion. Nevertheless…just because Alex makes mistakes on some things, he is right about there being a big military presence right near the bombing sites and has video and witnesses to prove it.
That is a piece of the puzzle that we shouldn’t ignore just because it’s from Alex Jones. Alex Jones reminds me of Glenn Beck, who sometimes, often makes big mistakes too.
Both are good guys. Both have opinions. We should listen to them all.
Should we blame everything on the FBI, who even before 9/11 warned the administration about a possible attack? Something is very wrong.
They were on our local news. Saying they love it here. So..until proven otherwise, we can take them at their word even though I don’t like the fact that we paid for them to get here with no consent from anybody who lives here…just a President’s wish.
But my Muslim neighbors who came down from Detroit….they don’t like America.
If Obama keeps letting these people in, (as they came in during Clinton’s’ time) maybe we should start questioning the Democrat’s reason for looking the other way when jihadist are let into the country.
Maybe…we should be asking them “Why?’
Or the question should be…how do THEY benefit from this “turn the other cheek” policy? Does it come down to helping get us to disarm?
After Boston, we should be demanding more answers:
Obama said this after the last suspect was arrested:
And that’s why we take care not to rush to judgment — not about the motivations of these individuals; certainly not about entire groups of people.
To which most Americans go —-WTF? The motivation was on their YouTube videos!
Obama ignores the facts, and we should ask him…why.
Nobody Cares that the most condemning facts all point to Obama’s philosophy. He is starting to look like: the “Criminal In Chief.” One thing we do know: whatever a politician does usually benefits himself.