Joyanna Adams

Nobody's Opinion

Nobody’s Email: Australia Warns America: Don’t Give Up Your Guns!

Nobody Gets Email

We didn’t want Obamacare…Obama did…so we now have it.  We didn’t higher taxies…Obama did…so all of us are paying more.

We don’t want our guns to be taken away. Obama does…and he is coming for them.

THIS is where we must draw the line. Any fool who doesn’t know this should watch this video.

Here…the good citizens of Australia are trying to warn us. Listen, and pass it around.

(Thanks to Tom Beebe)

January 11, 2013 - Posted by | Agenda 21, Angry Citizens, Australia, Gun Control, Obama, Uncategorized | , ,


  1. PS. I will add too, that most gun crimes are crim on crim crimes. I don’t mind these one bit.


    Comment by Amfortas | January 11, 2013 | Reply

  2. America with its 88 guns per 100 people likes to see itself as the highest gun-ownership nation and wants to stay that way. But Oz, with its draconian gun-ownership laws still has 130 guns per 100 people. Surprised? I was too. Most are in ‘bush’ rather than city. The US talks about the issue more than the laconic Aussie and this video is almost alone on the relevant shelf here.

    The gun buy-back was in response to the worst massacre the world had seen (at the time) not far from where I live, when Martin Bryant shot and killed 35 people at Port Arthur. Knee-jerk reactions are ‘human nature’ and similar to what we see whan an aircraft crashes – whole fleets are grounded and chaos ensues.

    The sentiment of gun owners in both of our contries is agreed (to, by me), in the main. Some of the arguments are spoiled by appeals to the ludicrous or the Constitution (in a willful act of blindness to its intent). I see most ‘gun crimes’ committed (here and in the US) by loonies and crims. The ordinary citizen in the street or at home doesn’t generally go out robbing shops and homes, banks and petrol stations, with a gun or without. If the issue were really about the use of guns in the commission of a crime then a simple mandatory loss of a limb for even carrying a gun during a crime could solve the problem. Crims would be deterred and loonies would be less of a bother of they had to hobble around and use only their left hand. I would ban the use of their belts and braces too just for fun and an added bugger-up factor. You rarely see people committing crimes with their pants falling down.

    The ‘us vs them’ issue of Guvmunt oppression is frankly a bit of a furphy in both countries but made far worse than reality allows by the ubiquitousness of gun-toting cops. Barely educated19 year olds fresh out of the Academy short-course where they swapped their high school uniform for a junior SWAT one, do not make the average 30 year old home-owner or motorist or shopkeeper confident. Even more so when it is a five-foot-sod-all girly who could not lift a night-stick without help and would resort to a ‘peacemaker’ at the drop of a hanky.


    Comment by Amfortas | January 11, 2013 | Reply

    • Once again…you go beyond the point! And that’s a good thing. Thanks.

      Joyanna Adams



      Comment by joyannaadams | January 12, 2013 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: