Joyanna Adams

Nobody's Opinion

Chinese Use General Sherman’s War Advice…

Nobody Reports

I came across this in my reading today:

If you were to destroy your “enemy” how would you go about it? (With a little help from the inside!)

“If my enemy came out against us in the open country, destroy industrial establishments whenever we found them, break up the lines of interior commercial intercourse, close the coal mines, seize and if necessary destroy the manufactories and commerce of Philadelphia, and of other large cities within our reach.” –General “Stonewall” Jackson

He also said this:

“Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible, and when you strike and over come him,  never let up in the pursuit so long as your men have strength to follow: for an army routed, if hotly pursued, becomes panic striken and can then be destroyed by half their number. The other rule is, never fight against heavy odds. If by any possible maneuvering you can hurl your own force on only a part, and that the weakest part, of you enemy and crush it. Such tactics will win every time and a small army may thus destroy a large one in detail and repeated victory will make it invincible.”

Nobody Thinks the Chinese have studied our own history more than our own leaders have, and they are doing exactly as Sherman suggested, and without firing a shot.

What’s our weakest link?

Our politicians.

 

October 19, 2011 Posted by | History | , , , | 2 Comments

Nobody Knows Who Won the Debate: Nobody

Nobody Knows

While watching last night’s Republican Debate in Las Vegas I tried to picture in my mind, which one of the candidates would be able to stand head to head against Obama in a debate because not one of them sticks out as someone we were all hoping for: therefore if you can’t have the one you want, look for the one you need.

Nobody divides the candidates into two categories: Candidates who will carry on big bank and big business interests, and everybody else;

BIG BUSINESS:

Mitt Romney: Son of an X-Governor of Michigan, Mitt spent the night trying to convince everyone he would repeal the child of Romneycare– Obamacare. So..what’s to keep him from coming up with an even more draconian health care plan once he’s President?  Anyone who would store the family dog on top of a car for a vacation because the dog messed in the car…you can’t trust. Underneath that practiced smile is…a mean streak. Sure…he knows how to fix jobs, with government help. He’s Obama II in a nice smiley happy face.

WARNING WILL ROGERS: Mitt is a Lawyer from Harvard, the cesspool from which most of our troubles are hatched.

Mitt would be so boring against Obama most conservatives would stay home. Obama would win.

Rick Perry: He’s so much like Bush it’s creepy, but Rick evidently can fly a fighter jet solo, something I’m not sure George W. could do.  He’d keep us in wars, pump up the Latinos, and is VERY good for big business…as he keeps bragging about all those big companies (like e-bay) coming into Texas. Little business? Good luck, another globalist.

Obama would pulverized  him in a debate. Like George W., he fumbles when he talks, although, he’s getting better, but he only has a year.

Herman Cain; None of us are sure about 999…and the other candidates professed it would hurt the little guy.  I haven’t read enough on it yet…BUT..on every other subject, he is hitting home runs: Immigration: strong, Foreign policy…certainly not any worse.. They didn’t talk about China, but we all love how he feels about Sharia law.  HIs Mitt was “Wall Street” and I am for “main street” was a good sound bite.

His weakness is his connection to the Federal Reserve. To libertarians,  and some conservatives who know that the Federal Reserve has been a major player in all that has happened to us…Herman Cain will side with the Reserve. And so, you have to wonder…where did this guy come from? Is he a Trojen horse?

Herman Cain would make potato salad out of Obama, in a debate, although he needs to prepare.

EVERYBODY ELSE

Ron Paul: Nobody can  help myself: When I watch Ron Paul I think of Jimmy Steward in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. He is right in everything he says, about the Feds, our overblown government, immigrants, but his solutions sound almost crazy. Half the population works for the government. You cut those jobs, and you sink the Titanic. It’s not his fault that America became so weighted down with greed and government waste, but you have to have jobs for those you cut. He needs to tell us what PRIVATE sector jobs he can find for them, and not just shift the ones who get cut to another government job. What does that solve? . He’d have to reverse the new global patent laws that were just passed. Ron is right about us protecting the world…we need to stop.

Ron Paul debating Obama  would be like Attila the Hun smashing Bambi. He would make Obama look stupid, but Obama would use that and make Ron look MEAN, and crazy. It’s what a good politician would do, and Ron Paul would lose it.  That’s his drawback. His honesty. Hate to say it, but in today’s politicians, nice guys lose, and Obama would get nasty. Just look what Obama did to Donald Trump, a much more savvy guy..

Rick Santorum: For a closing argument, he did the best 30 seconds of them all. He’s a likeable guy in every way, made good points, but  he wouldn’t get any minorities, because he is conservative to the core. He need to get into the Senate.

Rick VS Obama: Obama would make him look…sadly, old fashioned. He would play upon his star power. Matt Damon would be making fun of him on MTV. Sarandon would make him the anti-Christ.

Newt Gingrich: The old college professor always steals the platform with wit and grace, and his knowledge of history. But he has sided with the democrats on global warming and cap and trade, and is never to be trusted. He is running to help the party, the party of no change.

Newt VS Obama: Not sure…he could debate him, but he reminds me of Ted Kennedy. He is part of the Washington corruption that probably won’t leave until he dies. He would lose, maybe not the debates, but the election.

Michelle Bachmann: Once again…says the right things, but she has no presence. It’s not her fault. In this media driven world, you MUST have presence. I just found out that she owns a subsidized farm.  When she pleaded for the AMERICAN woman who is suffering,….and then she did the politically correct: “English will remain the language of the government”  she lost me.

WHAT? So, the rest of the people can babble in whatever language they want just so the politicians can understand each other?

Michelle would do the worst against Obama. Not because of her ideas, but because..I hate to say it…she needs to look formidable. And she doesn’t. Palin didn’t. The only woman I can think of who can stand up to the big boys in debate is Michelle Maulkin, and she’s not running.

So who won the debate? Nobody thinks only Herman Cain could win against Obama.  He’d get enough of the black vote and the independents to push him off his pedestal, but I’m not sure he won the debate.

So far, the big global lobbyists are pushing  Romney.

Nobody predicted last year that Romney would be the nomination, because the big multinational companies and banks run the world now.

Will this happen? In that case we will have another damned if you do and damned if you don’t election.

If Herman is the Mitt alternative, at least he will tell us all jokes while we pay more taxes on our bread.

If Mitt runs: Nobody Wins.

(Thanks to Tom Beebe…and that’s me..watching the debate.)

October 19, 2011 Posted by | Elections | , | 2 Comments