Rupert Murdock…Humble and Right
Nobody Wonders
WOW— all of a sudden, Rupert Murdock, and his vast media empire, has been thrown into the proverbial firing pan. Here in the States, FOX News has been the main conservative and common sense cable station, and all the rest—CNN, MSNBC, and the other seemingly meaningless sitcoms and stations, are almost wacko in their attacks on anything conservative. When Bill Clinton was in office, CNN was his personal body guard.
So, as you can imagine, Rupert Murdoch is looked at as sort of savior to conservatives in America. Whatever shows we get from the BBC are filled with very liberal attutudes…bleending hearts sort of things. And all of a sudden, we find out, as if on cue: (Weinergate, Caseygate.. and now..Murdochgate) that yes folks…we have…another criminaL
It’s clear that the “elites” on the liberal side have decided to throw in their prime minister as a bonus. Why not kill two birds with one stone? And who ARE these people?
And if you want to really know the “elites” watch Charlie Rose. Charlie’s whole brain is plugged into the “elites” of the world who seem to reside in Edinburgh somewhere. Nobody feels that after WWII, the Americans took over the “empire,” but somehow (probably due to Churchill) the elites of the British kept control. The Royals and the Lords etc…are still connected deeply to our American elites. Many of our world leaders from both parties have spent time at Oxford. It’s like “elite” school 101.
Some call it the illuminati…some just call them rich and arrogant. Let’s just say, they all hang out together, want to control the whole world, and are now fighting over it.
Whatever…most of us will never know the real truth, mainly because, so few people control most of everything now we see now. With all the ‘elites” talks of democracy there is NOTHING democratic about the European Union, the dictators of the middle East, China, or as we are now so painfully witnessing.. America.
We little nobodies just sit and watch the big boys put out their best scandals, and fight over all the money that they can grab from the millions beneath them. It’s like watching pigs fight at a trough.
And the pigs are out to get Murdoch, and I’m not saying he’s innocent of anything, I just like his product. Something tells me his editor was in the middle of the storm, and was the one he trusted…all that red hair, who wouldn’t? I’m sure there were many others.
I’ve only read a few details on the Murdoch case, but I did watch him read his statement and thought it was straightforward…and honest. On Charlie Rose, they tore him apart, saying that “Oh he read the lawyer thing very well didn’t he? “—as if the man were senile. They predicted the end of Rupert, but I can’t see that happening, but then again, he is a danger to them. They insinutated that he had something to do with the “death” of the whistleblower. Right, so who put that bullet hole in Ron Brown’s head again?
For that matter, many feel Princess Diana was murdered. How in the world will we ever know? And speaking of unknowable… how in the world did that comedian get that close to Rupert? Really, who among us Nobodies thinks mabybe he was just “let” in? Is the British security really that daft?
As for the hacking of phones, Piers Morgan did it, and now he’s on CNN holding a cushy job. Why is he not being indicted? Nobody Thinks if FOX did this stuff to get a story, then so did CNN, MSNBC…and most all of them. They are just using it now to hang the man and his influence which has been overwhelmingly against liberals. As Ann Coulter pointed out in her piece today, when Newt Gingrich was illegally taped, Time Magazine was all over it. Nobody thought anything was wrong about it. It was an “accident.”
Sure.
We all know the sex scandals.that come out on politicians at JUST the right time in order to get rid of them. They are now saying the Prime Minister Cameron saw the FOX news people too many times? Gee, over here, Obama not only sees Jeffery Immelt every single day, he puts him on taxpayers payroll.
And where can you find the real truth? On Snopes?
George Soros owns Snopes.
Who do you trust? Wiki Leaks? With all the information out there, and so many of us trying to pick and choose, what’s true, what’s not…heck we still don’t know who killed Kennedy, really.
What we do know…is not very pretty.
I got this video from a very liberal friend. It’s shows what liberals think of Rupert Murdock. Frankly, I think satellites are a good thing. But then again, I’ve never lived in Britain. It’s nevertheless a very clever and entertaining piece of satire.
(Thanks to JR)

How can one be scared by a chap called Rupert?
Rambo, yes. Sly, hmmmm. Arnie Swaaaaartznigrer, yes, O’ almost anything. B’jesus yes. But someone named after a teddy bear?
Now, Rebekah ? Experience shows that even a simple disagreement about who called a taxi is likely to get you punched in the face by her Hairy Grandness. The misogyny of the newspapers under her Editorship we now know described women as ‘Tart’s and ‘Slappers’ at her specific direction. No doubt to create just the ammunition for other feminist harpies to blame the ‘male dominated media’.
But while Rupert will hide his head in a tree with a honey-pot in its branches and hope people forget about his nocturnal ramblings, Rebekah will get a billion dollar resignation bonus, Book contract, TV show and very likely the position of next Commissioner of Police that she has already paid for.
LikeLike
And how I count on you to put it all in the right perspective.
Joyanna Adams
LikeLike
Although….. Rupert is just like another bear, one of little brain. He put his Trust in Rebekah and treated her as an unofficial ‘daughter’. Methinks he is besotted, or high on honey.
LikeLike