Van Jones Wants to Rule the Goyims
Nobody’s Opinion
Last week’s standoff in Nevada, was a perfect example on how communists, or as Van Jones likes to call himself, progressives, plan to take over, and control the world. Just about everybody knows that a few hundred cattle are not going to kill of a turtle species, but that’s how the left intents to “take” over the world: with eco-green ‘energy’ that all of them will make a lot of money off of.
The turtle needs to be saved, but the cow, farts. It’s gotta go. So what if it feeds the world? They don’t want it, and they don’t want you to be able to eat hamburgers and drink milk…that’s only for them…like Obamacare.
They are doing this for our own good.
It’s not the first time a group of men have tried to take over the world, but listen to Van Jones explain, that they have to ‘change’ America in little steps. Those little steps add up. Actually, they have managed to take over our schools, and universities with hundreds of little steps. And Michelle Obama is now telling us what she WANTS us to eat. She has even changed McDonald’s menu, and her demands have cost billions of dollars to everyone in the food industry.
Make no mistake, that’s no little step.
Little steps. How many little steps have been taken to get rid of religion and the family? How many little steps have been taken to knock out small businesses? For that matter, how many BIG steps have been taken to fortify wealth into just a very few hands?
The idea of a few men running the world is nothing new. Just by accident, a few weeks ago, I came upon a book that contained, the “Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion.” If you search the internet, you will never in a hundred years find out where this piece of work came from, but one thing you will learn when reading it, is that men (And let’s be frank here, the Jews aren’t the only ones) have been trying to figure out how to control the world since before the floods.
For instance, in Protocol No 1
“it must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorization, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare.”
I don’t agree with this at all…it seems to me the world over, that most people just want to be left alone. Most people are good, and the proof of that is the fact that we all drive on the right side of the street. Now, if you take this as describing Obama, I’d say he hit it right on. ..but imagine Van Jones saying this: “All men are harming the planet for their own selfish reasons, therefore only people like me should rule.” This gives them the right in their minds to be…ruthless pigs.
“Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one’s party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority.”
Okay, they call this liberalism; Name the enemy first. The GOP are racist, misogynists, who will let you drown after a tsunami (one of Van Jones favorite images) and therefore elect the democrats! So they did, and you gave them power…to crush you.
“The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down ruler from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim, (Nobodies) but we must in no wise be guided by them. “
The democrats I think have this philosophy tattooed on their foreheads, with invisible ink. Obamacare will kill millions…it’s not moral, and yet, they passed it on Christmas Eve. Can’t get more immoral than that. They don’t care, it’s about control, and wealth.
“On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. “
Can you say, Harvard, Yale, (Van Jones went to Yale, hard to believe isn’t it?) Oxford?
Anyway, that’s just Protocol No. one. There’s 24 of them. And they mirror what is happening today in the elites halls of ‘progressives’ from both parties. You have to wonder if they don’t put a copy on their pillow at night at all the top hotels.
The Obama still have two more years to “fundamentally change America” and today, we saw another shooting: a “Nazi” shot some Jews here in America. Guns is top on the lists.
Their agenda has been clear: Control—. Of the internet, of your health, your energy consumption, how much money you are allowed to make, how long you will be allowed to work, and how many cows can walk on your ranch. Oh, and don’t have kids. Be gay and adopt. We’d like that.
Glenn Beck exposed Van Jones for what he was…he was an avowed communist. So poor Obama had to get him another job. Now you can see him on Crossfire on CNN where he can take the illiterates of his generation…down to tyranny. Step by step.
Am I worried about Van Jones?
Ha. Nobody watches CNN…now if he gets on FOX…
The Tea Party BUGS Van Jones, Let’s Keep It Up!
Nobody Reports
WHAT?
The tea party patriots are smashing down every institution that our grandfathers built? What is this man smoking?
Uh…the only people who have been dismantling the great American institutions are the liberal democrats..and their friends, the very proud avowed communists, as this man is. What’s even more amazing that the there are people out there who think our schools are great, and that the tea party wants to tear down American institutions.
The tea party want the unions to stop DESTROYING our children’s minds. To a democrat it’s okay if your kid stays dumb…as long as the teachers get their big checks and benefits. How DARE you want to destroy their livelihood.
As for unions…
Jefferson didn’t belong to no union.
Washington didn’t belong to no union.
I’m pretty sure Abraham Lincoln didn’t belong to no union.
The only thing American about unions is the teamsters, who worked hand in hand with the Mafia and the democratic party.
Van Jones is a communist. It’s time everyone start calling him what he is: delusional.
Revolutionary Leaders: Van Jones VS Sam Adams
Revolutions. Sam Adams was the man who, along with Colonel James Otis, fanned the flames of the American Revolution. Van Jones has been trying to do the same, spark a ‘revolution.’ The progressives will tell you that Van Jones is just doing what our founders did…but…there IS a big difference. Van Jones wants redistribution of wealth, and reparations for slavery. Van Jones is a addmitted communist. Sam Adams fought for freedom. Here’s a good explanation from Judge Napolitano:
“When America was in its infancy and struggling to find a culture and frustrated at governance from Great Britain, the word most frequently uttered in speeches and pamphlets and letters was not safety or taxes or peace; it was freedom.”
Two acts of Parliament broke the bonds with the mother country irreparably. The first was the Stamp Act, which was enforced by British soldiers writing their own search warrants and rummaging through the personal possessions of colonists looking to see whether they had purchased the government’s stamps. The second was the imposition of a tax to finance the Church of England, which the colonists were forced to pay, no matter their religious beliefs. (Think of Obama making the Catholic Church pay for abortions.)
The Stamp Act assaulted the right to be left alone in the home, and the tax for the Church of England assaulted the freedom to choose to support one’s own means of worship. The two taxes together caused many colonists to realize they needed to secede from England and form their own country in which freedom would be protected by the government, not assaulted by it.”
Boston had been on a slow boil for years before the stamp act. Sam’s father, Deacon Adams lost his money in the Land Bank crash (think 2008) The family lost all its money, and Sam, unlike his dad, was a lousy businessman. Deacon Adams drew up Boston’s declarations of grievances against the British government, in 1731 as “Breaches of the Magna Charta, The Charter of Province and an Act of Parliament.” In 1740 the colony reached the crisis of an economics depression.They really don’t mention that in the history books do they?. But in the book Sam Adams: Pioneer in Propaganda” the author John C. Miller says this:
“The promoters of the Land Bank were frankly inflationist who proposed to bring back prosperity by flooding the country with paper bills and at the same time to ‘humble the Merchants” by taking the control of currency out of their hands.”
Sound familiar? Think Federal Reserve. 
So, out of this ‘depression’ came two distinct social classes :rich and poor. The rich were the British governors who hoarded, and it wasn’t until 45 years later that the American ‘revolution’ came..and it came with mobs.
The mobs of Boston, of which there were two…North and South, which by the way, didn’t get along until Sam Adams united them, had their nemesis in Thomas Hutchinson. HE outlawed paper money through Parliamentary legislation.
In 1750 the mob went after his house, and burned it. And he wasn’t the only one they went after: in fact they had a hit list of 15 houses. 
Hutchinson was their ‘Obama.” Otis feared Hutchinson more because he used, ” soft words, a smiling countenance, fair promises and other tickling blandishments to gain his purpose.”
Nobody says that sounds like Obama…does it not?
Due to the depression of 1731, the merchants of America started illegally trading with other countries and making themselves wealthy, not the British empire. The colonies were run by a few British oligarchic families. Sam Adams, who by this time had discovered his true talent, writing, spent his life continuing his father’s pastime: politics. Everyone read Sam Adams in the newspapers, and at night the citizens would go to the pubs and out of those pubs came the Sons of Liberty, formed in 1765. Of course, sometimes those “Sons of Liberty” got a little too drunk on rum and went looking for houses to burn.
King George had his own problems. He was in debt for the French and Indian War, (And his own wars against the French overseas) and the citizens of Britain thought the colonies were fat and happy,— THEY didn’t want to be taxed anymore. Something had to give. So, when the stamp act came, Sam lead the way with “no taxation without representation.” And Sam —-took control of the ‘mob’.
Sam was asking for British rights. If we were going to be taxed, then we should have a voice. That concept is from the English Magna Charta. People should have a voice, but the Americans didn’t. So Napolitano has it right. The revolution was mostly about our freedom.
Nobody Thinks that history seems to be repeating itself. The American people are being taxed and put into a debt they can never repay, by an oligarchy much like the one that ruled us in the beginning.
The elites are well aware of the imparity. They know that the people are getting pretty fed up, as we did so long ago. That’s why they are taking our freedoms in the name of “protecting us.” They’ve made too many promises, and squandered trillions.
Many people are predicting “mobs” here in America. 
Van Jones, wants to take control of those mobs. But, unlike Sam Adams, Van Jones is a communist. Communists make revolutions in order put in dictatorships, as a means to an end. Van Jones is calling for more protest this weekend.
Sam Adams, joined the two mobs of Boston, and brought us…in the end…freedom. Van Jones revolution will bring us…tyranny.
So next time you hear Van Jones talking about ‘revolution’ remember: Pick your revolutionary leaders well., or else next thing you know…you’ll be ordered to read Stalin’s’ exercise book, and all you will be able to afford to eat are vegetables grown in China.
Van Jones can take his “green” revolution and stick it where the sun don’t shine, which is probably what Sam would have said had been living in 2012. God Bless Sam Adams…In 1775, America picked the RIGHT revolutionary.
Will we do it again?


