Joyanna Adams

Nobody's Opinion

Monopoly or Mobopoly?

Nobody’s Opinion

“It has been demonstrated again and again, from Imperial Rome to Weimar Germany, that epidemic greed is a symptom not of reveling in present triumphs but of a fear that the game is winding down.”–Laurence Shames(1951) “Wall Street Greed is Fueled by Fear” 15 June 1989

Monopoly. Remember that game? I do. I hated it when I was a kid. It was long, it was boring, and my brother always won…every single time. And here I was too many years later…losing again.

Last Friday night it was a night of, “Let’s get away from the Television shall we?” for the family. We have been playing Monopoly on the Holidays gatherings and I always  lose. I was becoming the laughing stock of the family. So…Friday night, I was determined to win. To war. To kill. I was going to be ruthless, something that is completely against my character as a human being.  I watched the other player’s strategies, took the best from each player, and went for the throat.

And I was..ruthless. Not only was I the only player who had any buildings on their properties, I had all the money. ALL the $500 dollars were stacked high in my slots, after I had emptied out the bank with all my winnings.  I had all the railroads, all the utilities, just the right properties, and every time any player landed on my property, it cost them over $1,000. I had  hotels on every piece I owned.

As I watched the faces of my family, members that I have watched time and again…winning, I could see the surprise, the depression, the hopelessness drain from their faces. It wasn’t just a game anymore. I was winning. I was ecstatic, I wanted it all. I wanted to “do it again.”

Now, I’m no psychologist, but there is a theory that to “win” at anything, you must plan, strategize, and show no mercy. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Rockefeller…politicians… they all play that game.

And winning is the best feeling in the world. Why had I always never tried to win? Was it because I didn’t want to hurt others feelings? That was part of it. Somehow the Christian upbringing came into it. I didn’t like to make people feel bad. I wanted them to like me.

But, I did notice, that unlike when I was a kid, now, I really didn’t care that the other players felt bad … After all…it’s a game. I told myself.

Exactly.  It’s the game. And I thought…is this how it feels to grab the millions on Wall Street?

Whoa.

So, where did this game that everyone has played all over the world come from?

History reports that Charles B. Darrow of Germantown, Pennsylvania, showed the game to the executives of Parker Brothers, during the depression of 1934. It was very similar to one patented in 1904 by Lizzie J. Maggie, a Quaker woman from Virginia. The game was called,  The Landlord’s Game, and was based on the philosophy that the renting of land and real estate produced an unearned increase in land values that profited a few individuals (landlords) rather than the majority of the people (tenants). It was intended to illustrate the negative aspects of concentrating land in private monopolies.

Former Wall Streeter Derk Solko explains, “Monopoly has you grinding your opponents into dust. It’s a very negative experience. It’s all about cackling when your opponent lands on your space and you get to take all their money.”

And isn’t that what the world has witness these last few years? The bankers (with the help of our politicians) went wild, lost trillions, and the whole world collapsed. They did not go to jail, and they passed GO so many times they had to close hundreds of banks just to keep up.  

Or was this a planned collapsed?

While communists like Van Jones use the fact that a bunch of Wall Street thugs got together with a bunch of American Presidents (Van Jones leaves out all politicians) to monopolize the very essence of our money to —spread his communist message around….he just wants that rich to “give it back.”– It’s the wrong way to approach the problem.

The problem is, the rich will never give it back. He’s sitting on Boardwalk with three hotels. It will be the other players on the board that will be placing the money in the pot.  

Because of this tremendous greed that we have witnessed…there is a big push to get rid of capitalism, but it’s not capitalism that is bad, it’s the monopolies formed by governments with their hands in the pockets of multinational companies, some of whom have more money than most countries, that kicks us all off the board.

Nobody Thinks that there is definelty a  well planned global monopoly strategy.

The rest of us want the monopolies of global multinational companies to be broken up and allow more competition, and have us all get a piece of the pie that way. But that’s not part of the plan. Like in Monopoly, once you hold the most property, you almost always win.

Unless you change the game.
****

Nobody Wonders how much the game of Monopoly has influenced the adults walking around on Wall Street at the moment? Or our politicians?
*****

Nobody Thinks that the sheer joy of winning and smashing your competition must be addicting. Heck, if I can get so ‘high’ off a simple game of Monoploy, what kind of “high” do people like George Soros get? Like synapses in your brain being formed to desire cocaine, the same desire to devour your competition to a pulp without caring a hoot about how many lives it destroys, might have started with that feeling that you got as a child winning Monopoly.

I’m not so sure it was a good thing that I never took the game seriously. If Monopoly was invented to teach children about the horrible effects of what can happen when one person has all the control to take all your money, it didn’t really do a very good job. Instead we got a lot of people addicted to winning at all costs, and then smashing everything else around them.  

In the United States, men running monopolies have broken the bank of America….just like I did, and I can bet you, every man guilty of that, Corzine, Bernanke, the Goldman Sacks, Barney Franks…—they all feel like they just won a game of Monopoly. Hoo-rah. It’s not about caring about the world, it’s about winning the game.

And the game is still on: Mobopoly. Pick your pieces, hold onto your money… and roll.

April 1, 2012 - Posted by | communism, corruption, economy, Global Government, Globalization, Goldman Sachs, History, Life, Presidents | , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments »

  1. In fact, Pattie, I am a grumpy old fart, but don’t tell anyone.

    Like

    Comment by Amfortas | April 2, 2012 | Reply

  2. “But You are already in the Top 5% of the nicest 1% of the top 4% of blogger people in the world.”
    Amfortus is the sweetest guy ever!!! Is’nt he?
    I bow to you – you Grand Monopoly Queen on high!
    REMATCH……

    Like

    Comment by Pattie | April 2, 2012 | Reply

    • LOL!

      Joyanna Adams

      ________________________________

      Like

      Comment by joyannaadams | April 2, 2012 | Reply

  3. Whooooa, there is a huge amount of insight there to keep us going several times around the board. But one or two properties of the real game are overlooked.

    You mentioned greedy MEN revelling in ‘winning’, but 80% of all purchases are in the hands of women. One aspect of the real game is dominated by women regardless of who owns the hotels. Indeed, Paris Hilton’s daddy may own some hotels but all by herself she buys as much as all the men in Iceland. And she doesn’t even have a friggin’ job! (Unless you count shagging as many men as there are in Iceland as a job)

    The women, if they wished, could stop the game simply by stopping shopping and going around the board time after time. Paying some of their fines and rents might help too.

    Not only but also…. there is a hubristic saying amongst women that behind every ‘successful’ man (ie, the ones who are supposedly doing all the hooting when they win) there is a woman. And by golly does she ever encourage him to keep winning so she can keep spending. How many women would own 2000 pairs of shoes if they had a President Marcos in their pocket?

    Then there are the rent-seeking women. We are probably talking of at least a hundred per rich chap. Mistresses and serving wenches of a growing variety gravitate toward the wealthy chap with the row of houses, the Top Hat token and the big bankroll sitting on view.. It is one hell of an incentive.

    And then there are the rich women. Over 65% of the wealth of America is in Women’s hands. They usually inherit it, or take a share from wealthy husbands like say Kobe Bryants super rich ex-wife or Heather Mills who enjoys the royalties of songs made before she lost her friggin’ leg. The richest person in Australia is Gina Reinhart. The next five richest together can just about challenge her to a monopoly game but by golly she would make them bring their own chairs.

    A third issue ( It was two above, wasn’t it. I lose track of my verbal spending) about the real world is the assumption that all those who currently occupy the Top 1% will be there tomorrow. The ‘rich’ change chairs faster than the poor do. The mechanism for greed interacts very well with the plethora of likely mistakes and the scrambling of the next 20% down the line who want to relieve the rich chap of his money. The rich seem not to stay in the super- rich bracket for long.

    I would really enjoy being in the top 1% even if just for a year or two. Maybe cornering the market in Sugar Puffs is the way to go. But I guess I will have to be content with being in the top 2% of some other measure of plenty.

    Joy, play Monopoly, m’dear. It is safe. It is a game. And you don’t have money enough for three pairs of shoes. After its over you can all have a laugh and congratulate one another for beating the odds. In the real world there isn’t an end to it to look forward to. Even when the board is kicked over, as it is from time to time, you have to keep playing.

    But You are already in the Top 5% of the nicest 1% of the top 4% of blogger people in the world.

    Like

    Comment by Amfortas | April 2, 2012 | Reply

    • Well…I’m a champion TWICE by your good graces Sir!   Thank you!

      Joyanna Adams

      ________________________________

      Like

      Comment by joyannaadams | April 2, 2012 | Reply


Leave a comment