Joyanna Adams

Nobody's Opinion

To Nude…or Not to Nude…

Nobody Reports

Just after Royal Harry was caught wandering around Las Vegas, nude, and showing various prostitutes his expertise with cocaine, well— Boys will be boys—

The Queen offs him off to Afghanistan for punishment.

Sitting and having to watch that last Olympic Showdown must have been too great a strain on the lad.

BUT…when the future Queen Kate is caught lounging around showing off her naked breasts outside on somebody else’s porch, because you know, that’s how the Royals like to relax..nude….because let’s face it: Wearing all those millions dollar outfits is really hard work—The Queen goes all into a huff and sued the magazine who’s reporter voyeur was just waiting for the score.

Now I don’t care what kind of BS they put out about Royal privacy….the rulers of the world want a pass. It’s okay for them to put up an actual bloody police state, with camera’s recording every single citizen’s every single move but oh..catch them with their clothes off..and you will be punished.

Maybe all the woman in England should start flashing those corner cameras in support.

Here’s the deal. You can’t tell me, that with all the ‘properness” of being a Queen that somewhere in the Manuel it doesn’t say “Don’t take your clothes off outside because YOU are being watched.’

What kind of idiot does that? I can only assume that Kate either 1) Like Harry didn’t give a hoot about anyone and is a spoiled brat, or 2) She has a big ego about herself and wants to be photographed.

So what does the Queen do? She sends them off to the Solomon Islands for a photo shoot, where the women are KNOWN to go around like the natives, and Kate is photographed in her lovely clothes again.  And where.. the local negroes carry the Prince and his bride like they should…on thrones.

Tell me, where else in the world can you get a bunch of negroes to carry you on a throne?

Funny: Nobody finds this offensive, in the 21st century?—A Prince and his Bride being carried on a throne by negroes.

In other news more pertinent to the days event’s, Cindy Adams reported this on her site this little nugget.”

Reported to me, Henry Kissinger has stated — and I quote the statement word for word: “In 10 years, there will be no more Israel.”

I repeat: “In 10 years, there will be no more Israel.”

Ten Years? Nobody Thinks…has anyone in the news asked him…WHY?

What she didn’t say was whether he said this with a smile.

September 18, 2012 - Posted by | British, Uncategorized | , , ,

4 Comments »

  1. PS. I know you only posted that to get me going. 🙂

    Like

    amfortas's avatar Comment by amfortas | September 18, 2012 | Reply

  2. I have to rise to defend some matters, if you will forgive my insistence.

    Harry: As the photo shows, carrying such guests around in that manner is a local custom and not a British one. When our Royals are abroad they are often obliged to ‘succumb’ to local customs which would be considered bizarre in Brighton and British West Hartlepools.

    So with Harry in Las Vegas. His cavorting naked with prostitutes (Were they? And how can you tell them from other American women in Las Vegas? Let’s just say rude girls who take their clothes off and get themselves photographed by all and sundry) was simply fitting in with the local demands. He has been known to play football with kiddies on patches of rough ground too.

    I would look to you local customs in Las vegas were I you, Joy.

    🙂

    Kate: Was half a mile from the nearest road and in her Brother’s holiday home. I would not be at all surprised if someone on holiday sat naked on their balcony enjoying the sunshine. I could agree with your general thrust if you criticised her for walking near naked through a shopping centre (another American female custom, I understand, which I hope she is not obliged to do), but this was really in private. I suppose if someone took a snap of the Joyanna charms whilst you were taking a shower you would be quicker to defend your privacy than you are to dismiss Kate’s.

    What dismay’s me more is that the snaps (taken at great effort with high powered equipment) were eagerly bought by women’s magazine editors to show all their female readers. Just why anyone, women included, would want to confirm that Kate has breasts beats me, but then I am just a simple chap. Of course she has breasts. And we could have easily guessed before that she was a ‘A’ cup without having the blurry confirmation either.

    I suppose that if some photographer, intent on following your hastily laid down rules about public figures always being in the public light, were to go to great lengths to photograph the President’s wife as she comes out of the shower, water dripping from her pert, brown, ‘C’ cup tits, (the public owns the White House, remember, so there can be no expectation of privacy in a public place, eh?), then you will be equally scathing of Michelle.

    Harry again: Harry goes to Afghanistan because he is a soldier. It is not a punishment post like Mackrahanish. Rather it is a ‘active theatre’ post where medals can be gained for valiant activity. It is a very long time since any American son-of-powerful-folk has done his duty in such a way. Give Harry some credit, my dear.

    Like

    amfortas's avatar Comment by amfortas | September 18, 2012 | Reply

    • LOL! Yes, so the Royals are not expected to set an example…in morals, in statue, in representing their people? Your argument is that they are simply normal people, nothing expected of them there. You have low expectations of your leaders. And I would agree if those pictures were takin INSIDE a house. or INSIDE a shower, then I would agree with you, but please, to say that being outside nude is the same as being inside nude is the same is ridiculous. That’s why curtains were invented. I have never been nude outside a house, my neighbors can think me. good god, drones could have taken pictures of her. Now, I understand in Europe nudity is all the rage..but then again…I guess that doesn’t lead to sex.? What? Because they have made being nude a habit of the rich that makes it BETTER than you’re average Las Vegas girl? We here in America, may very well have a few private nude beaches, but on the whole, my arugment is a ROYAL should know that she is a target and lay on her bed in her bedroom, curtains closed. If one of our first ladies was lounging in the nude at some ‘private’ beach, and she was photographed I’d be saying the very same thing. If you are a leader of a country, cover up your privates. You represent a people. HA! They get no slack from me! Nevertheless…Harry I will agree that Harry is a good soldeir, even if he likes to romp with naked women. What? No comment on the behavior of Royals being carried by “slaves girls?” That’s one thing you won’t see in America. LOL! And yes, we DO have fun!

      Joyanna Adams

      ________________________________

      Like

      Joyanna Adams's avatar Comment by joyannaadams | September 18, 2012 | Reply

      • I rather like to romp with nekkid women too. Not that I get much chance. And I will walk nekkid on MY property whenever I please and expect others to keep their nosy noses to themselves. What they do in their back yard is their business. And I AM Royal. I am in line to the Throne.

        Joy, the issue is not what people do in private, nor their regal or otherwise status. It is a matter of gawping and spying and being a friggin’ nuisance.

        By the way, I thoroughly recommend that you stand (sit, lounge about, ‘bathe’ or simply wander amongst the flowers) nekkid in the sunshine from time to time. It is YOUR sun and your skin. Preferable away from prying eyes, but God loves you anyway.

        Like

        amfortas's avatar Comment by amfortas | September 18, 2012


Leave a reply to amfortas Cancel reply