Joyanna Adams

Nobody's Opinion

Nobody Remembers Charles Lindbergh

Nobody Remembers

Once upon a time, one of America’s greatest hero’s Charles Lindbergh, spoke out against America getting involved in Europe. The reason? He didn’t think we were ready. Here is a speech he gave in New York on April 23, 1941, as a representative of America First Committee, a group that was trying to keep us out of the war.Charles Limbergh

Remember as you read this, after we did get involved, he worked hard for the American cause and was named a brigadier general in the Air Force Reserve by President Eisenhower in 1954.

Some of that speech:

There are many viewpoints from which the issues of this war can be argued. Some are primarily idealistic. Some are primarily practical. One should, I believe, strive for a balance of both. But, since the subjects that can be covered in a single address are limited, tonight I shall discuss the war from a viewpoint which is primarily practical. Is it not that I believe ideals are unimportant, even among the realities of war: but if a nation is to survive in a hostile world, its ideals must be backed by the hard logic of military practicability. If the outcome of war depended upon ideals alone, this would be a different world than it is today.

I know I will be severely criticized by the interventionist in America when I say we should not enter a war unless we have reasonable chance of winning.

I do not blame England for his hope or for asking for our assistance. But we now know that she declared a war under circumstances which led to the defeat of every nation that sided with her, from Poland to Greece. We know the in the desperation of war England promised to all those nations armed assistance that she could not send. We know that she misinformed them, as she has misinformed us, concerning her state of preparation, her military strength and the progress of the war.

(Is this not happening now in the Ukraine? Were they NOT promised help from Europe and America?)

He goes on in his speech to say that militarily we could not win this war:

Suppose we had an air force that we could send to Europe. Where could it operate? Some of our squadrons might be based in the British Isles, but it is physically impossible to base enough aircraft in the British Isles alone to equal in strength the aircraft that can be based on the continent of Europe.

(Boy, was HE wrong.)

“There is a policy open to this nation that will lead to success….a policy that leaves us free to follow our own way of life and to develop our own civilization.

It is based upon the belief that the security of a nation lies in the strength and character of its own people. It recommends the maintenance of armed forces sufficient to defend this hemisphere from attack by any combination of foreign powers. It demands faith in an independent American destiny. This is the policy of the America First Committee today. It is a policy not of isolation but of independence: not of defeat but of courage.Ben Franklin 2

(Great stuff…keep going.)

We have weakened ourselves for many months, and, still worse, we have divided our own people by this dabbling in Europe’s wars. While we should have been concentrating on American defense we have been forced to argue over foreign quarrels. We must turn our eyes and our faith back to our own country before it is too late.

We have been led toward war by a minority of our people. This minority has power. It has influence. It has a loud voice. But it does not represent the American people.

(Gee, not much has changed, has it?)

During the last several years I have traveled over this country from one end to the other. I have talked to many hundreds of men and women, and I have letters from tens of thousands more who feel the same way and you and I. Most of these people have no influence or power. Most of them have no means of expressing their convictions except by their vote, which has always been against this war. They are the citizen who have had to work too hard at their daily jobs to organize political meetings. Hitherto, they have relied upon their vote to express their feelings: but now they find that it is hardly remembered except in the oratory of a political campaign.

And so, the good news? According to our last election, the America that Charles Lindbergh talked about is still out there.

The bad news? We STILL have no influence or power. If we had any say in any of the wars, Vietnam and Iraq would have been done shorter, with more force, and with finality.

If Charles were alive today, I’m sure he would say: We are not prepared to fight another war:

But…something tells me…we will.

 

February 19, 2015 - Posted by | History, Uncategorized, War | ,

3 Comments »

  1. Lindberg was trying to put one over on America with his false dichotomy between the Ideal and the Practical. It really wasn’t his fault because generations of Americans have been taught that being idealistic (moral) isn’t practical – that “moral laws bear no relation to he job of living, except as an impediment and threat” (Ayn Rand). But properly defined, the Moral and the Practical are identical. Morality is the code of values that men use to make their lives better – to achieve success and happiness; How is that not practical?

    It would be enticing for America to just close its’ eyes and ignore the barbarians outside the gate, but that is neither moral nor practical. I am reminded of the words of the man whose bust our President removed from his office:

    “If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

    ― Winston S. Churchill

    Like

    snopercod's avatar Comment by snopercod | February 20, 2015 | Reply

  2. Unless the western countries grasp the principle that Principle is the first requirement, they will not only not be sufficiently prepared to defend themselves (a matter of principle) nor know which conflicts it must (by principle) engage in.

    Being ill-prepared or insufficient by some arbitrary standard cannot be an excuse. It does not, even in practice, stand when one is attacked. No matter how ill-prepared one is, some defence is necessary. You HAVE to fight. America discovered this at Pearl Harbour. So too, when a conflict arises where a principal evil is clear, it must be engaged.

    Lindbergh never managed to grasp this. Today’s politicians are much the same when they ‘consider’ Islam. The ‘fact’ that other allies of Britain fell is no reflection on Britain. They fell fighting evil. Both on principle and practicality. Britain nearly fell but refused to lie down. It stood on and with Principle. The fact that Britain stood alone against a manifest evil was the only Principle that he should have focused upon. He would have been a fine dinner companion for Chamberlain.

    You either stand against evil or you enable it. That is a clear Principle.

    Like

    Amfortas's avatar Comment by Amfortas | February 19, 2015 | Reply

    • Well said snopercod, Now, I need to look more into Charles. It seems, right before the war, he was over in Germany, and Hitler was showing off all his planes, and the vast buildup, and that spooked him. America, if I remember my history right was NOT ready for a war. But we did rally. Back then, we had real leaders. So many of our ‘progressive’ Presidents would downsize the military. Bill Clinton did the same thing, He had the military so small, that WHEN we were attacked on 9/11, it took Bush some time to get it back up to speed. We should be at full throttle at all times, and I believed Charles said that. Having said THAT…we were not attacked in Vietnam. It was never fully explained to the American people WHY we should fear communists spreading over Vietnam. The part of the speech that attracted me was the fact that the people are so busy just managing their lives, and so, a small group of powerful men, do make the decisions…when did the power shift happen? Probably when the Federal Reserve was created. What do you think snopercod?   England did stand up to Hilter, brave and true the English, and they deserved our help… but only because of the Churchill who had WARNED them for years at what was coming..WAS there in their darkest hour did they prevail. I see history repeating itself. Except now, the enemy is living among us. If we are attacked again, will Obama gather up all Muslims? Not a chance. He seems by all accounts and actions to welcome it.

      Like

      Joyanna Adams's avatar Comment by Joyanna Adams | February 20, 2015 | Reply


Leave a comment