There IS a NWO Button, and It’s Another NWO Reset With Hillary’s Name On It.

Nobody’s Opinion

Remember when Obama, AND John McCain, AND John Kerry, were trying to drum up the American people into going to war in Syria and getting rid of that evil man Assad? We were told that he was evil and gassing his own people, even though, his country had always allowed Christians to reside peacefully. John Kerry used to dine with him.

Many of us remember President George W. Bush making the same case for going into Iraq. Saddam Hussein was evil and cruel to his own people, and had WMDs.  It was right after 9/11 and so the people trusted him.

Why didn’t they follow through with it? Obama kept telling us he HAD the power go it alone in Syria.

But weary of wars, the American people had heard it all before and along with the men in uniform, and there was a resounding: NO.

So, like gun control, the politicians have just put it aside for another day…and isn’t that day coming fast again?

Usually wars have to be started with some kind of outrage. The latest beheading of Americans and British journalists are welcomed by Obama. He says, it will make the other Muslims see how evil they are. But it has also infuriated western civilization everywhere, hasn’t it?

(Ask yourself—WHY havn’t those video’s been taken down?)

Now, the logical thing for any leader to do, would be to go get this one man for now…who is making all the gruesome videos. But our leaders will use this somehow to drum up the people into going into Syria. It’s just a matter of days.

If you watched the above video, then you would know by Wesley Clark’s words that taking out Assad is part of the New World Order, which according to this young man, is all about keeping the dollar as the Petro standard.

And what does this have to do with Henry Kissinger, writing an editorial in the Wall Street Journal about the New World Order?

Just how IS that New World Order coming along–– Henry?

“The clash between the international economy and the political institutions that ostensibly govern it also weakens the sense of common purpose necessary for world order. The economic system has become global, while the political structure of the world remains based on the nation-state. Economic globalization, in its essence, ignores national frontiers. Foreign policy affirms them, even as it seeks to reconcile conflicting national aims or ideals of world order.”

Translation: We need a one world currency, and those pesky countries just keep trying to get rid of the dollar. No matter how hard we try, people just don’t want to become one big global nation and get rid of those damn borders. Only OUR banks need to control the markets. And the world is just not co-operating at the moment.

The New World Order, if you need a refresher course, was thought up long ago by the elite bankers and politicians, who decided that in order to spread democracy we need to get into every country’s market, and tie ALL the markets together, making them dependent on one another so that no nation would go to war, ending all wars forevermore.

That was the lofty goal they all toasted. The REAL goal, was about, as usual, control of the money, and who gets the most of it.

Henry also says:

“The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense; the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order. Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries.”

Right. See, Henry puts it into his usual gobbley gook nonsense. Except, globalization hasn’t really worked out to their lofty idea has it? America has been plundered, and China remained communist, and used our American CEO’s to their advantage, putting millions out of work in America. We have 96 million people still unemployed here, and our CEO’s want communism here since it has worked out so well for China.

And globalization has placed China on the road to being Numero Uno. Nevertheless, in a global stock market, it makes no difference if America is number one in anything.

Henry goes on:

“The international order thus faces a paradox: Its prosperity is dependent on the success of globalization, but the process produces a political reaction that often works counter to its aspirations.”

Didn’t expect to sacrifice the United States, Henry?

“To play a responsible role in the evolution of a 21st-century world order, the U.S. must be prepared to answer a number of questions for itself: What do we seek to prevent, no matter how it happens, and if necessary alone? What do we seek to achieve, even if not supported by any multilateral effort? What do we seek to achieve, or prevent, only if supported by an alliance? What should we not engage in, even if urged on by a multilateral group or an alliance? What is the nature of the values that we seek to advance? And how much does the application of these values depend on circumstance.” 

******

“The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another.”

Well, I don’t know about you, but Kissinger with these words seems to prove that the guy in this video is EXACTLY right. The United States will use military force to get its way and damn the rest of the world if it won’t join us, because all the leaders in the world are wise to what Henry’s New World Order would mean for them.

Guess who Kissinger wants to be the next President if this World War III comes about?

Here is what he had to say about Hillary:

“And she ran the State Department in the most effective way that I’ve ever seen.” More effectively than he did, his interviewer asked? “Yes,” he replies, adding: “I was more chaotic.”

(God, don’t you just want to punch something? Pass me that pillow.)

And IF all these things come to pass, IF the United States goes to take out Syria, and Iran, and therefore gets into it with Russia and China, do you really want Hillary Clinton protecting the United States?

Does she have enough buttons?

I’m watching the start of the Hillary can be a great military leader propaganda campaign right now on PBS with the story of the Roosevelt’s. The word “progressives” was said as if an angel was mouthing it from on high.

Hey, the Roosevelt strategy worked with Obama. Before 2016, Hillary will be compared as being smarter and braver than all the Roosevelt’s combined.

So this Nobody asks, as she sits alone in front of her computer tonight, listening to the last crickets of the summer,–if Hillary is allowed to become President…

What difference does it make?

September 15, 2014 Posted by Joyanna Adams | Hillary Clinton, New World Order, Uncategorized | Hillary, Kissenger, New World Order | 2 Comments