Desperate times call for desperate measures: And the globalists ARE desperate: All this weekend the calling sound bite of every major pundit on the planet was: Donald Trump, “the racist birther” needs to apologize to the President of the United States.
Never mind that Donald Trump dropped the whole ‘birther’ thing BEFORE he started to run for the office. And yes, Hillary DID start it when she ran against Obama. She just got other people to pass it around. Remember, the delete queen never leaves a trail.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Preibus said Sunday:
“I don’t think Donald Trump was thinking about 2016 in 2011,” he said. “It was an issue that he was interested in. It was an issue that I believe, and I think the preponderance of evidence shows Hillary Clinton started it.”
You see, Americans are no longer allowed to dare QUESTION their King…oh, excuse me, President.
Not even when we see evidence like his Harvard Yearbook picture: >
And now, in order to distract the public from the latest three terror attacks in the United States, Hillary’s obvious health issues, and her ‘deplorable’ comments, they have to attack Trump. And since they can’t attack him on the issues, the only card they have to play is race. And the conservatives are going at him just as strong as the liberals.
Do our well-paid political reporters like Chris Wallace show this Law School page on their TV? Has anybody even questioned the Harvard Law Review for printing this ‘falsehood’ way back when Obama was in law school? And by the way, why has Obama locked up ALL his school records. Could it be that they contain a lot of the “born in Kenya” stuff that Obama is trying so hard to cover up?
Desperate they are: Just today, read if you will the top headlines on the Huffington Post:
Priebus Parrots Trump’s Birther Lie
Christie Falsely Claims Trump Gave Up on Birtherism Years Ago
Pence Insisted the Birther Issue If Over, Kasich
Trump Owes Obama An Apology for Birtherism Claims
There’s a reason Trump Can’t Shake His Birther Past
And my personal favorite: Jane Goodall: Trump’s Behavior Similar to Male Chimpanzees.
And just to get away from the Birther Headlines,
“Trump Hints At Assassination: Disarm Hilary’s Bodyguards, “Let’s See What Happens to Her.”
The Puppet Master: Trump Plays Press Like a Fiddle in Birther Bluff
Trump Pushes Lies Over Clinton’s Role in the Birther Conspiracy
Hillary Unloads: Trump Peddling A Racist Conspiracy Theory.”
Okay, that’s 9 headlines at the top of the page right there. Really? That’s all ya got?
FACT: NOBODY was talking about Obama’s birth records recently. Not Donald. Not his fans, Nobody. What is most insidious is that the news pundits kept bringing up the subject hour after hour claiming it was TRUMP that was talking about it.
Nope. It was them. All them. Every title, every question, every soundbite, THEM.
So Trump told everybody: Hey! I’m going to give a press conference! And I’ll talk about it! So they all showed up, and had to listen to 17 highly decorated generals, admirals, Congressional metal winners, all endorse Trump.
That HAD to hurt.
In the meantime, nine people were stabbed by a Muslim scumbag in a shopping Mall over the weekend. A bomb went off in New York, injuring 29. Nine people at the mall were stabbed. The FBI said there are 1,000 cases of Isis agents in all 50 states, and Obama is going to bring in 100,000 more. And there will be more Americans injured by Allah’s faithful nut jobs, but…what’s really important is that the blacks get out to vote for Hillary because you know…
We don’t want you to think about all those Mulims being let in by Obama, we want you to think about Trump being a racist.
Really. Ask yourself, how many times have Obama and the Clintons basically lied to our faces?
Was Obama born here? Probably not. But at this point, what difference does it make?
Four good men were left to die in Benghazi, and a man who “fundamentally changed our country” was allowed to destroy us.
The only thing we can do now, is clean house. and get as many people to go out to vote for Trump as we can.
One mean and nasty man named Barry Diller, says he will leave the country if another mean and nasty business man (Donald Trump) becomes President…Will he? Do we little nobodies care? By the looks of him, we ought to be glad that he is leaving the country…
Mr. Barry said: “I don’t think it’s got anything to do with American anger at the elites. He has no communication strategy—”
Nobody Knows how low an IQ can go, but something tells me that Mr. Barry doesn’t get off his luxury jet much. And to say that Trump has no communications strategy? Yes he does…it’s called…freedom of speech, Mr. Barry. And that’s why many people love him. He speaks with common sense and doesn’t run it through some million-dollar think tank. At least Donald has hair.
And speaking of mean and nasty…Obama is threatening to veto the defense bill if Congress doesn’t close Guantanamo Bay. Raha Wala, senior counsel at Human Rights First, noted Obama’s threatened vetoes before.
“We’ve heard many times that the president would veto bills over Guantánamo restrictions, and he’s never done it,” Wala said in an email. “What we need now is action. The Defense Authorization would prevent the president from closing Guantánamo before he leaves office. If he wants to close Guantánamo, the president must veto the bill and demand that Congress remove the restrictions on transferring detainees.”
So, our Presdient cares more about the jihadist murdering Muslims in Guantanmo Bay then he does about making sure our military men and women have the right stuff to continue to protect our country. Are you surprised?
Nobody Knows if John Bonehead will cave in and close it, saying that it was the only thing he could do to take care of our men and women in uniform, but I thinks the odds are better in that happening, than in me winning the PowerBall next week.
And going with that thought that Obama is more Muslim than American, it seems some brave journalist in Germany have more guts than the journalists here in America…He actually put up a picture of Merkel in a burka.
This is causing an outrage in Germany among some liberals:
The broadcaster defended the use of the image. “Of course it was also the of this artwork to provoke and polarise opinion,” it said in a statement.
“We consider this satirical form of representation to be in keeping with our journalistic values. We reject any insinuation that we would operate Islamophobic propaganda.”
And speaking of a phobia…our elite leaders: (All of them but a few I’m afraid) had Drudgeaphobia. They will soon be putting The Drudge Report out of business, if you listen to Drudge explain it. Drudge talks about himself in the video below, but to hear an even scarier fear from Matt, go check out this interview on Alex Jones site.
Soon the Supreme Court is going to come down HARD on copyright laws, and all in order to get rid of the great Matt Drudge, conservative Americans, and free press ANYWHERE on the internet. First they came for the Jews…and then the Christians, and then the patriots, and ….then…if this actually happens? Oh. God. Do people really know what that means?
Like Matt says…our days on the internet are numbered. Soon, it will belong to the state propaganda, and porn.
Will America fight? Or will we just twitter on?
I had to post this today, because in my own family, this is happening. This Nobody (me) has been notified to STOP talking about religion and politics around her family. Of course THEY are allowed to talk about it, usually saying to me, things that cause my eyebrows to raise beyond my forehead line. My right eyebrow is floating somewhere near the Space Station.
In fact, trying to muzzle my own opinions is like trying to muzzle elephants on a rampage. I’m winning my own muzzling so far….but….my eyes might pop out…I might have to say something to someone. Hopefully—I’ll find the nearest lamp post and be allowed to remain in the family.
I thought it was only MY problem…this “We don’t want to be upset about the current state of our country.” so…shut up, until I watched this video.
Is anybody else having this problem in their families?
(Thanks to Mark Dice)
These Russian girls were arrested for “twerking” in front of a war memorial, but I’m not seeing the twerk. Putin decided to put them in jail for a few days:
Three young women in southern Russia will serve up to 15 days in prison, on charges of hooliganism, after posting a video of themselves performing the hip-hop dance on YouTube, with a war memorial looming in the background. Two more of the six women in the video had their punishments reduced to a fine, for health reasons. One of the dancers was under 16, and avoided punishment, which was transferred to her mother, who was reprimanded for failing to “carry out measures to ensure the proper physical, intellectual, psychological, spiritual and moral development of the child,”
Here in America, our politicians are much more concerned that our citizens have the right to destroy property, as the Mayor of Baltimore said was a right that should be granted in riots.
If Madonna wanted to twerk in front of the WWII memorial in Washington D.C., Obama would close the park down and invite guests. So we have freedom of the twerk here in America,
But, you can’t drink a lot of soda in New York.
To me, it looked just like some girls who love to dance, (which young girls tend to do) trying to get some attention. Although, I must admit, those stripped pants are questionable. You can’t take your eyes off them, which was rather clever.
What I found more offensive than the video, was this comment below it:
Leave twerking for black girls, why white girls would lower them self to this cheap dance, and I not think is sexy at all just ridiculous.
What? White girls can’t dance? I think that front girl did a pretty good job.
Internet censorship has already begun at my house.
Fox news, yesterday AND today, are just blanked on my cable TV. I can get all other 100 channels, but FOX news is blanked out completely. It happens only during certain subjects are being discussed.
For five to ten minutes at a time. The ads come on, and it’s being blanked out when the subject is Obama or Israel.
Is this happening to anyone else? They didn’t blank out Netanyahu’s speech though. I would say it was a technical problem but WHY are all the other stations not effected?
This week, we have C.J. Pearson VS Bibi Netanyahu.
Let’s start with the obvious: Obama is making a secret deal with Iran, and in typical dictator fashion, he refuses to let anybody see the deal he is making, but word is, it’s a lousy deal. Obama who believes it’s Iran’s civil right to have nuclear capability, is making that happen.
And so what did Bibi do to piss of an American President? He dared to say, that he intends to protect his country and that Obama’s deal with Iran will endanger Israel to possible nuclear attack. In fact, it’s a certainty.
Because we have been friends with Israel ever since its founding….our Congress invited him to speak, which enraged King Obama. So, Obama got all his court democratic jesters to protest and say things like this:
Diane Feinstein, the Democratic senator from California, told CNN on Sunday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s contention that he is speaking for all Jews in lobbying against an agreement between the US and Iran is “arrogant.”
And then there’s the 12-year-old C. J. Pearson who became an internet sensation when he put his very impressive thinking on Youtube. He said that he didn’t believe that Obama loved the country. And for that…he got kicked off Facebook.
So who wins the Nobody’s Perfect Award for the week? Was it Bibi, who dared to try to warn the world that Obama was about to commit treason, not only against an ally but against his own country?
Or was it C.J. Pearson, who dared to criticized King Obama for being such a putz? And why him? LOTS of videos grace Facebook saying a lot of bad things about Obama. Could it be…it’s because he’s black? And other young black men are listening?
Obama. For being the most treasonous President ever to walk the halls of the White House.
May Sam Adams throw some tea down on his tyrannical head.
OR maybe—- it should be Facebook.
Take your pick.
Cosco, has kicked Dinses D’Souza’s book America off it’s shelves.
NEW YORK – The wholesale giant Costco has issued an order to remove all copies of Dinesh D’Souza’s bestselling book, “America: Imagine the World Without Her,” from the shelves of its stores nationwide,
And WHY would anyone ban a book, in the land of free speech?
Because it insults Obama and the president of Cosco, really likes him:
In total, Costco has given $100,000 to Obama and another $100,000 to Priorities USA, the pro-Obama super PAC.
Sinegal was the author of an email blast sent out by the Obama campaign in July 2012. Obama also held a fundraiser at Sinegal’s house in Seattle, during which the incumbent president said “the story of Costco and everything that you guys have done I think is representative of what America is all about.”
So, thank you Cosco—
Not only will I never grace any store of yours ever again in my life, you have just inspired me to not only go see the movie, but buy the book! I hadn’t thought about buying the book, since I have to BUDGET my household expenses, but you have just made up my mind.
Sam’s Club is just around the corner….
Remember last month when I posted the New States Constitution that our Federal Government Paid $25 million dollars to some dweebs in California to write?
And remember when that Constitution said that it should be in the hands of the government, to give the final say on who gets money for campaigning?
Well…Harvard Graduate Chuck Schumer is getting right on that…he wants to put a few more nails in the first amendment, and using the most powerful argument used by all politicians since the beginning of the country, he credited that the founders, would support his idea..(Only he got the wrong founder.)
Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, stumbled Tuesday over basic American history, crediting Thomas Jefferson for authorship of the Bill of Rights during a debate over the First Amendment and campaign finance.
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute,” Mr. Schumer said.
While Jefferson is deemed the principal author of the Declaration of Independence, he was not intimately involved in the writing of the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, which is the first 10 amendments to that founding document.
Uh…the first amendment cannot be absolute? You’re kidding me right? Well, if the first amendment is not absolute, then neither are any of the others. So in Mr. Schumer’s world, the right of citizens to bear arms (not absolute): no troops can be quartered in private homes: (that could change) Guards against unreasonable searches, and arrests and seizures of property (well, that’s already been destroyed) Obama can arrest anyone in the country, without a trial now…so that’s not absolute.
Well, one falls, so go all the others…in fact go read them, and weep.
While it is true that big corporations run the country, because we now have a plutocracy, if the democrats get to decide WHO gets to give money, they would make sure that the Koch brothers were at the top of the list, and George Soros wouldn’t even be on it, or any of their movie star friends.
While most of the time, I think the politicians know their history, this time, I think Schumer really did make this mistake.
He could care less who wrote the Bill of Rights…he just wanted to use Jefferson’s name.
Most of the Bill of Rights has been decimated.
You know what Jefferson say about Chuck’s interpretation of the Bill of Rights?
“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.”
To which the real writer of the Bill of Rights would add:
“The diffusion of knowledge is the only guardian of true liberty.”
Gee Chuck, if your going to site the founders to further your dirty work, at LEAST get it right. It’s a good thing some of us know still know how to read.
First: You could maybe see this happening in New York–but California, a state that wasn’t even in the Civil War, decided to ban the Confederate flag. The American flag is actually MORE offensive there…but one flag at a time I suppose.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California state government departments will be prohibited from selling or displaying items with an image of the Confederate flag under a bill that passed the Assembly on Monday.
AB2444 by Assemblyman Isadore Hall, D-Compton, is headed to the Senate after passing on a 72-1 vote. Hall introduced the bill after his mother saw replica Confederate money being sold at the state Capitol gift shop.
Well, if your mother is offended, that calls for a bill. Hey–campaign donations are considered free speech in this country, why not flags?
California didn’t leave it to just one flag, in an American high school in Morgan Hill, if you wave the American flag on Cinco de Mayo, you are a racist.
It happened Monday in California to a small group of protesters who waved U.S. flags in front of a school where officials had banned the practice to avoid violence threatened by Hispanic students celebrating Cinco de Mayo.
The controversy developed in 2010, when school officials ordered students not to wear U.S. flag-themed shirts on the Mexican holiday. The ban has been upheld by a federal appeals court.
The controversy brought a small group of protesters out Monday, and the community reacted immediately. “What’s wrong with these white people holding up American flags in Morgan hill??? Racist a–holes,” wrote Gia Lee in a feed monitored by Twitchy.
And the banning continued as we go to Florida:
Officials at Broward County Public Schools banned a fifth grader from reading the Bible during “free reading” time, according to lawyers from the Liberty Institute who are threatening to sue the school for violating the First Amendment.
Giovanni Rubeo is a fifth-grade student at the school, who had been given a Bible at church as a Christmas gift. It’s his favorite book, so he decided he’d like to read it during the time in class where students are allowed to read anything they choose.
So, what if you wanted to read Mein Kampf? Or the Koran? As we all know, the Bible is a dangerous book, and I suggest that student get the latest copy of “It takes a Village” or Playboy, Dreams of my Kenyan Father, or Bill Clinton’s “My Life.” (That’s a real thriller)
In North Carolina, students are being banned for mentioning “god” in their speeches at graduation:
A professor at a public university in North Carolina forbade his students from thanking God in personal statements that will be delivered during their departmental graduation ceremony on Friday.
In an email obtained by Campus Reform, Assistant Professor Eli Hvastkovs, who teaches chemistry at East Carolina University (ECU), instructed his students to prepare a “family friendly” 35 word personal statement that mentions future plans or “thanks someone.” The students, however, were explicitly forbidden from thanking God.
“You can’t thank God. I’m sorry about this – and I don’t want to have to outline the reasons why.” – Professor Eli Hvastkovs
No, he can’t give the reasons why, because he’s a communist. I wouldn’t admit that either. (Do you get the feeling the teachers are getting jealous of God?)
Actually, this last thing is good news: EVERYBODY knows you don’t tell kids that they can’t do something…it just makes them want to do it even more. By banning “god” the elites are going to drive millions of teenagers to him
Therefore, this “banning god” thing in school….might produce the opposite effect.
(Let’s not tell them.)
And last but not least, many liberals are trying to ban “praying” in the city council meetings in America. But ONE guy on the Supreme Court, Justice Kennedy, ruled in favor of our American history, and the first amendment..
So, who wins the Nobody’s Perfect Award for the Week?
The four Supreme Justices who voted against allowing prayer.
Sonia Sotomayer, Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader (I’ll just take a little nap) Ginsburg, and Stephen G. Breyer.
And frankly, for the Supreme Court to have to even give us permission to pray before a council meeting, shows you how far we have come….in losing our freedoms.
Whatever you may think of the last few weeks of “racial” remarks, they are protected by the 1st amendment. Americans…by our Constitution, have a right to say they hate one group or another. Or anybody for that matter.
(Was Spielberg trying to tell us something in Minority Report?)
Sterling, while an idiot AND a racist, had a recorded PRIVATE telephone call, probably as many suggest, a set-up by his girlfriend who didn’t get what she wanted.
We saw this with Mel Gibson. Shouldn’t there be a law against destroying careers with private telephone calls? Or is there one, and it’s just ignored?
Do they have a right to continue to work? Was Sterling NOT paying those black basketball players great salaries? Didn’t Mel Gibson give us some fantastic movies?
Well, Obama doesn’t have much time: In 2014, he might lose control of Congress, so the important news of today is he wants to monitor hate EVERYWHERE. It’s on the U.N. 21 Agenda list.
In other words, everyone must never say another word against anyone:
The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 “would create an updated comprehensive report examining the role of the Internet and other telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes based on gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation and create recommendations to address such crimes,”
The one-page bill, reviewed by WND, calls for the Justice Department and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights to “analyze information on the use of telecommunications, including the Internet, broadcast television and radio, cable television, public access television, commercial mobile services, and other electronic media, to advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate.”
Who would decide these crimes?
Have you ever been just writing along in Microsoft Word, and then right before your eyes, you watch your words disappear? I have. More than once. Most of the time it was when I was writing some insidious opinion on Obama, or Clintons, or the Bushes.
I figured I was going nuts–until I came across this article the other day:
The journalist Luke Harding’s book, The Snowden Files, came out earlier this month. But judging by Mr. Harding’s assertion that his words were somehow deleting themselves while he wrote about the NSA, it’s a wonder it came out at all.
While he was working on the book about Edward Snowden’s exploits, Mr. Harding writes in the Guardian, the sentences he wrote about the NSA would periodically garble or delete themselves.
From the Guardian:
Something odd happened. The paragraph I had just written began to self-delete. The cursor moved rapidly from the left, gobbling text. I watched my words vanish. When I tried to close my OpenOffice file the keyboard began flashing and bleeping.
Over the next few weeks these incidents of remote deletion happened several times. There was no fixed pattern but it tended to occur when I wrote disparagingly of the NSA. All authors expect criticism. But criticism before publication by an anonymous, divine third party is something novel. I began to leave notes for my secret reader. I tried to be polite, but irritation crept in. Once I wrote: “Good morning. I don’t mind you reading my manuscript – you’re doing so already – but I’d be grateful if you don’t delete it. Thank you.” There was no reply.
A month later the mysterious reader – him, her, they? – abruptly disappeared.
Well, I can’t tell you how I felt when I read this. I am certainly not as important a character as the reporter that is writing about Snowdon. and yet, years ago, when I was in contact with a young women in D.C., whose father was in the CIA, she all of a sudden told me she couldn’t talk to me anymore. We were really great friends. This was back when Bill Clinton was President. I have wondered ever since if I struck someone somewhere in Georgetown as being “dangerous.”
I do still have one reader there according to my stats.
But, I’m not special in any way. I happen to believe the government has a dossier on every “patriotic” American, and it’s no conspiracy when Homeland Security even lists us as a threat.
Basically, it’s a form of censorship. And now that Obama has given the internet to the world, something, which by the way, he had NO authority to do, this kind of thing will become the norm. Wait till China and Russia put their two cents in.
The truth is, the liberals have been desperate to silence the internet for many years because it really is the last place that the normal citizen’s voice can be heard.
If you think our government does NOT want to censure us…look at what the I.R.S. did to the Tea Party groups.
Let’s go back: Remember the E-PARASITE legislation, a bill proposed by Congress that was formerly known as the Senate-backed PROTECT IP Act? It was intended to punish copyright infringement–as well as toy with its definitions to a harrowing degree. Websites would be guilty until proven innocent. Search engines would punish you to the dustbin of the superinternet basement. Obama’s FCC Diversity Czar, Mark Lloyd was on record for praising Hugo Chavez for shutting down private media companies.
FROM CONSERVATIVE: Robert McChesney is the founder of Free Press, a group with close ties to the Obama administration. He has ADMITTED what the REAL GOAL is with Net Neutrality: “At the moment, the battle over network neutrality is not to completely eliminate the telephone and cable companies. We are not at that point yet. But the ultimate goal is to get rid of the media capitalists in the phone and cable companies and to divest them from control.” emphasis added
And now that Obama has given the internet over to other countries, he endangers our very lives. What’s bad about this? Well for a start. Censorship. Internet Taxes—and worst of all, he is putting us in more danger of a cyber attack by our enemies
Brad Blakeman (Pentagon) cautioned that he is more concerned about the situation today than he was in 2010, saying “I had the opportunity to meet with Dr. [Robert] Kahn, one of the inventors of the Internet at the Pentagon, as well as Admiral McConnell, about the Internet and cyber-attacks. And our country is hit tens of thousands of times a day through the Internet in cyber-attacks both on our private sector and public sector. “The information we are able to gather through the type of control we have on the internet is one of the reasons why America is safer than we would be if we were under international control. This is a matter of national security, as well as economic security.”
As for whether this could lead to some type of UN-sponsored international Internet tax, Blakeman said, “Absolutely. They could set rates. You know, we give out the IP addresses as the domain names for relatively small amounts of money, which is then passed on to the consumer through programs they have through their Internet providers. The cost of it is so low and now we’re going to be beholden to an international body who’s going to start determining rates or worse yet, access to the Internet. Who gets a domain name? Who gets an IP number?”
But go figure: the big boys love it: Google, Zuckerface, Verizon, AT&T, and Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller argued that the transition will help ensure the Internet remains free and open.
Right…if Mr. One World Government thinks it’s a good idea, that should make us all feel better.
For now, we might be safe. But AFTER the next elections…I wonder.
My friends amforatas in Australia thinks that the internet will always be free…that the internet will change the world, and no government will be able to control it.
I hope he’s right, because as much as Hillary Clinton and Obama stand up and give great speeches about ‘freedom of speech’ it’s all a ruse.
They mean…and want..to control it all. We’ve seen the internet crushed by dictators in other countries, could it happen here?
The FCC is directly interfering with our free market system, by giving bureaucrats power over Internet carriers. The Net Neutrality Act seems to be part of a larger effort by the Obama administration to exert power and speech restrictions over the entirety of the Internet, what you can see when you are on it, and how you access it. However, what we have today is a fundamentally broken system that funnels most of the wealth and most of the power into the hands of the ultra-wealthy and the gigantic corporations that they own.
I gave a factual account of what the president was going to do and sure enough now in 2014, safely re-elected, our internationalist president is seeking to give our most important precious asset, the Internet, to basically international control. The United States developed it with taxpayer dollars at DARPA, which is at the Pentagon, as an open architecture networking. We didn’t keep it for ourselves, we monetized it and were able to make countries a lot smarter, a lot freer and now the president seeks to be beholden. Now they’re going to have a say beyond their borders. This is one of the worst acts that a President of the United States could ever do because it’s so destructive to our country.”
And Nobody Wins, when one traitorous man, gives away what was not his to give…
Putin REALLY wanted his Russian Olympics to show the world the music and the history of Russia and he spared no expense. It’s the most expensive Olympics ever held. So, when one of the rings in the Olympic symbol didn’t show up at the opening ceremonies, and the giant structure could not be illuminated by fireworks as planned…no problem. While the rest of the world saw the snowflake that didn’t blossom into a ring, Russia saw what Putin wanted them to see on THEIR T.V’s.
Obama, on the other hand, while claiming to have the most transparent administration in history, has kept secret just about everything he does. Obamacare was done behind closed doors, the new Asia treaty is being done secretly without Congress, and today, he told French President …..
“I can do anything I want.”
From Nourishing Obscurity (thanks to amfortas for the info)
This past Sunday evening former NSA contractor Edward Snowden sat down for an interview with German television network ARD.
The interview has been intentionally blocked from the US public, with virtually no major broadcast news outlets covering this story. In addition, the video has been taken down almost immediately every time it’s posted on YouTube.
In contrast, this was treated as a major political event in both print and broadcast media, in Germany, and across much of the world. In the interview, Mr. Snowden lays out a succinct case as to how these domestic surveillance programs undermine and erode human rights and democratic freedom.
He states that his “breaking point” was “seeing Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress” denying the existence of a domestic spying programs while under questioning in March of last year.
So which President wins the contest at being the biggest dictator when it comes to censorship this week?
Obama! It’s one thing to make an artistic decision, it’s quite another to bar the American people from being able to listen to one of the most important interviews held about the NSA.
And for that, Obama wins the gold.
And speaking of imperfection….
Does Bob Costas have pink eye? or was it just a case of Botox gone wrong? Let’s ask Joan Rivers, shall we?
The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.”
I watched the movie Fat Man and Little Boy last night, and was pleasantly amazed how that movie, actually presented both sides of the moral issues of the American’s developing the Atomic bomb.
If you’ve never seen it, a brief refresher:
America is fighting a war on both ends of the world, and the government is looking for a way to end it, and so it is decided to gather the best physicists they can find (many of them German) at a top secret location and give them $2 billion dollars, a deadline, and tell them to just do it: give the U.S. the biggest bomb ever invented. Robert Oppenheimer, the lead genius, (Played by Dwight Schultz) is incredibly excited, but needs a general (played by Paul Newman) to keep pushing him, especially when word gets out exactly what they are doing and scientists start to protest against the use of it. The film is all about, what great minds can do when pushed.
Whatever you might think of the atomic weapons, the sheer ingenuity of it you have to admit, was beyond incredible. BUT…as you see in the scene above, with it came a double edged sword. Towards the final days when they were getting near to their bomb being near completion, many of the scientists started having second thoughts.
The very secrecy of the bomb, and the fact that even today, no one has told us if those hundreds of nuclear tests done by our country, left any permanent radioactive damage to the earth, means our government has held too many secrets way too long from the American people. The 300 nuclear aerial tests America did alone —-is enough to give one thought.
As you saw in the film in 1989, the bomb was invented to ‘protect us’…it was the reasoning that our government used to justify the money spent for all those explosions.
And now, although not seen as a weapon YET…we see the same thing happening with the spy technology being developed with the money from our government. Trillions are being spent…money we don’t have, but no matter.
Due to a whistleblower named Edward Snowdon, we have just found out how every one of our lives is being recorded, and eventually studied. No, unlike the atomic and hydrogen bomb, this technology can’t kill us, but like the atomic bomb, some of the computer scientists that help set up this program are very concerned. This technology, like the atomic bomb, will sooner or later be held by many other countries. There is already a ‘cyber’ war, and like the nuclear arms race, we now have a surveillance arms race. Great power will be put in the hands of the few.
The strong propaganda coming from both the RiNO’s and the Obama administration is that this unconstitutional data gathering is being sold as necessary for our own protection.
Robert Oppenheimer was asked to work on the Hydrogen bomb, and he refused. Edward Tiller, though, was happy to do it.
Today, we see a young genius named Zuckerberg all excited bout getting everybody in the world ONLINE…everybody. That means everybody in the world will be spied on. Nobody Knows how he is going to pay for this, but you can bet your next last FACEBOOK post about your dog eating your cell phone, that our government will find a way.
And Zuckerberg is no Oppenheimer. Many of these young boys playing god with the backing of Obama and Homeland security have NO idea the damage they might be doing. Like the atomic bomb, the sheer joy is just in doing it. They are doing it, for money, and because the technology excites them. They rationalize , that to know what every single human being on the planet is thinking, will give them the power, to make the world a better place.
But it’s sad but true, that this technology can ONLY lead to tyranny, because as the good doctor suggests: Nobody should play God, the position is already taken.
And so, history repeats itself.
The world now, is waiting for Iran or North Korea, to use a nuclear weapon. And with the upcoming NSA surveillance program, we now live in daily fear of what we say and do with every phone call, every internet post, every bank transaction…and they even want into our homes with TV monitoring and Google Glasses.
It’s a New World Order.
And NOBODY, except the people at the top, likes it.
“I believe in a Zone of Privacy,” Hillary Clinton. (For HER!)
Two days before the Trinity test, Oppenheimer expressed his hopes and fears in a quotation from the Bhagavad Gita:
In battle, in the forest, at the precipice in the mountains,
On the dark great sea, in the midst of javelins and arrows,
In sleep, in confusion, in the depths of shame,
The good deeds a man has done before defend him.
Nobody Thinks, that the ‘good deed’ fuse is getting shorter…don’t you?
Last week, here in Missouri, a hard-working rodeo clown put on a mask of Obama and asked the crowd if they would like to see Obama run down by a bull. The crowd loved it. ( I would have too.) Someone posted a video, and the Democrats jumped on that story like a pack of piranha’s snacking on Michael Moore left thigh for lunch.
Didn’t I tell you? Anything that they can make a racial issue out of…they will.
It’s a running joke that has been happening at rodeo’s across the nation since they started. In fact, wearing masks and making fun of Presidents has been a grand tradition since the beginning of our country…we have a Constitutional right to make fun of all politicians.
The clown was meant to be imitating a dummy, another witness, Missouri Rodeo Cowboy Association member David Berry, told the Associated Press. Bull ring clowns often dress as sitting presidents, Mr. Berry said.
What the hell is this? A redneck lynching? There has NOT been in my memory… a Halloween that’s gone by that somebody was not wearing a President’s mask. Ban all the people from wearing Presidents mask at Halloween then.
I’m sorry. Mr. Obama doesn’t get special privileges just because he’s half-black, and wants to play Hitler. The conservative people HATE Obama, not because he’s black, but because he is destroying their lives…of course they loved it.
We need to remind EVERYONE that we do have a first amendment right to free speech. This is a dangerous precedent, but Obama will not be mocked by anyone. And we have seen him come down on this poor man with the full force of his army.
Missouri is being blasted as being full of racists rednecks, and the poor man was barred from life from ever being a clown again. I would SUE if I were him.
I live in Missouri, and it is much like the country. Our black populations live mostly in St. Louis and Kansas City. The rest of the state is rural, and conservative. Our House AND Senate is Republican..
And yet…what never made sense to me is—-How could the state elect overwhelmingly a Republican House and Senate AND yet…get to the booth and go…Uh..well…I want Democrats to be in the top seats? No. Nope. Didn’t happen. Nope.
Mitt Romney did beat Obama there in 2012 by almost 10 points, 53.8 percent to 44.4 percent.
So, all these conservatives…voted for a Republican President, a Republican Congress…but decided to elect a Democrat (Jay Nixon) for governor? And Claire McCaskill for Senate? Claire ..who has always been a staunch Obama lover, is hated just as much as Obama by conservatives here in Missouri. How in the world did she get elected?”
I don’t think so. That I why I have always said….watch who the leaders are. It matters not what the people’s representatives do, if the guys at the top are ‘progressives.” And as long as they keep their hand-picked men at the top…let the people vote all they want. It’s rigged here in Missouri—all my gut instincts say so. Maybe not everywhere, but they take care of these things. How ELSE did the Clintons stay in power for so long?
The White House spokesman, Josh Earnest, said this:
“It was certainly not one of the finer moments in our state.”
Well Josh, as a native Missourian I have this to say:
“The election of Barack Obama was not one of the finer moments in our history. In fact, he is probably next to Bill Clinton, the biggest mistake we ever made. Obama is against all the things that we love as Americans. Sam Adams would be leading the tea party throwing his basketballs into the ocean. Obama doesn’t like white, gun-toting, bible clinging Americans, and they don’t like him.
And this Halloween, I am wearing my Obama mask when I answer the door. It would do the country well if all conservatives put on his mask, and give the kids….nothing, or take their candy away. They are never too young to learn who their enemies are and what communism is all about. In fact, if that clown doesn’t want that mask anymore he can send it to my house.