JFK: Just Because They Write Our History, Doesn’t Mean We Have to Believe It.

Nobody’s Opinion

On the day that Kennedy was assassinated I remember they let us out of school early. I was sad to hear it, but more sad for those around me. Children were crying on the bus ride home. My parents, really didn’t have much to say about the event to my brother and I, because we had heard them talking many times about how they didn’t trust Kennedy. Both my parents were WWII veterans, and to them, Kennedy didn’t have the right war experience. He was a rich man’s son, was all show, and we had to dig bunkers in the back yard because the man was so incompetent.

Today, on all the Sunday talk shows, JFK was the top subject. All the pundits came to praise the man, and stayed to the historical record: Oswald was the lone gunman, and all these conspiracy nuts out there writing pages of conspiracy theories, are just that: conspiracy nuts.  In fact, Bob Schieffer, on Face the Nation, went so far as to say Lee Harvey Oswald was a right-wing radical. And of course, Texas, where all those right-wing nut jobs live,  was more responsible for his death than most anybody.

What? What does this tell us? Our media is state controlled and has been for decades.

Three men have come out with books on the killing of Kennedy recently, in order  to take advantage of the 50th anniversary of his death: Bill O’Reilly, Jerome Corsi, and Roger Stone. Bill O’Reilly, takes the ‘Oswald acted alone” course which he always does, because he is part of the ‘insiders’ of Washington.  But Corsi and Stone, have a different take, which is—-

LBJ, (that right-wing terrorist), was the man that killed Kennedy. (Along with the help of Dulles)

I had read this theory about 15 years ago. I had found a book at some old garage sale,  written by LBJ’s lawyer.  He admitted that he really thought, due to his legal associations with LBJ, and LBJ’s  ‘admittance’ on his deathbed, that LBJ was guilty.

Good luck finding that book anywhere.

Last night on Coast to Coast, Roger Stone, the author of The Man Who Killed Kennedy,  said this: LBJ was the man who had him assassinated, (because he was the man who would benefit the most) and he also concluded he killed Bobby Kennedy, and Martin Luther King.  Nobody Thinks that most of the evidence that Kennedy was killed by his vice president, not only makes sense, but for so many prominent people to take the stance that our government would never do such a thing—is just such nonsense it borders almost on absurdity. It shows uncontestable ignorance of not only  history, but human behavior.

But…the main goal is, and always will be— to protect the OFFICE of the Presidency at all costs. Lie, bully, cheat but protect that office to the point of death, because it represents what the office must have beyond a shadow of a doubt: complete legitimacy. The illusion of a perfect benevolent leader must never be refuted.   And so this year, they brought in Tom Hanks to put out some strong propaganda to get those people who are actually thinking out loud in public—- to stop it. He made a movie about it: Parkland.

Stone says this on his website.

Now let’s circle back to Tom Hanks, who cared enough to capitalize on the 50th anniversary of the president’s death, but not enough to research what actually happened on Nov. 22, 1963. Parkland makes no mention of the strange wounds found by the emergency room workers, because this would be contrary to the autopsy performed under military supervision at Bethesda Naval Hospital. The grapefruit sized exit wound in the back of Kennedy’s head, described by more than forty witnesses, is also missing from the film. Even Tom Robinson, the mortician who prepared Kennedy for his casket, clearly indicated the large exit wound on the back of the head was “pretty much between” Kennedy’s ears. The Warren Commission went against the description of virtually every eyewitness and concluded that the back of Kennedy’s skull was intact, again concealing a shot from the front… Tom Hanks also followed suit.

At the time, the Secret Service was under orders, and the man at the helm was the one who gained the most from the president’s assassination: Lyndon Johnson. Lyndon Johnson ordered that the presidential limousine–which was in fact the crime scene–be immediately destroyed.

( Remember when Clinton ordered our Navy carriers to quickly get John Jr. plane out of the ocean and immediately destroyed?)

And so…if you realized that Kennedy was killed for political reasons, whether to stop him from getting rid of the Federal Reserve, or stopping our involvement in Vietnam, or to stop LBJ from going to jail, (He was by all accounts a big time criminal with ties to the mob)— you realize that the leaders of the Western world are no better than some communist dictators.

The Bunch right after his death on Air Force One.

If they want to destroy their enemies, by killing them…they just do.

And if people believe that LBJ killed Kennedy, then anything is possible, is it not?

Nobody Thinks there were plenty of reason for the Royal Family to kill Diana. And JFK Jr. was going to run for Congress in New York, which would have prevented Hillary from running for President, because she needed that seat. The Clintons have a long line of mysterious murders in their past, which is ignored by all but the few.

And what about Jackie?—- That sweet, innocent, high society beauty? It’s Jackie’s reaction that always bothered me. If you ever listened to Jackie, she talked JUST like Marilyn Monroe, in that very fake raspy breath. I remember hearing her talking to LBJ one day on the radio, (not long after Jacks’ death) and it was almost as if she was giving him sex over the phone. It was astounding to me. Was she in on it?

Was she finally tired of Jack screwing everything in sight?

In the next few days, we will all have to go once again through the reels of the  glamorized fantasy of what a great man he was, and conservatives will be pointing out the good things he did: like lowering taxes and getting us to the moon. And compared to Obama, Kennedy was a sweetheart. Despite the democrats milking his legacy every year because they need all the help they can get, the truth seems to be that LBJ had to get the help of the mob and the CIA to pull it off. Is it any wonder the tremendous PR they have created to guard the democratic party? They HAD to do it. It was a matter of survival to them all.

Jackie made sure that the real truth will not be looked till way beyond 2050— Too bad we can’t ask her why.  And no one in Congress will ever look into it, because what IS important to our “state leaders” is the myth of the ever loving, caring, never hurt a soul –honest United State President, leader of the ‘free’ world, and that image remains untarnished. You know, they would never kill people.Especially a famous one.

Just because they write the history doesn’t mean we have to believe it.

Oh…yes—Stone worked for Nixon, and Nixon admitted that LBJ killed Kennedy, one night after he had a little too much to drink.

The question is: Do you believe him, or is this just another right-wing conspiracy? Many Americans are starting to wonder….

November 18, 2013 Posted by Joyanna Adams | American History, conspiracy, democrats, Uncategorized | corruption, History, JFK assasination | 4 Comments