Nobody’s Perfect: Marco Rubio
Nobody’s Perfect
He’s good-looking and gave a great speech last year when he lost the Presidential race…BUT….
Marco Rubio, the man who started the “little hands” fight with Trump, is back at his old job, and frankly, I wish he would have just run for Mayor of Miami. instead of getting back into Congress.
He would be called “Little MMM…Miami Mayor Marco” and he could get a home on Marco Island and take his helicopter to work every morning.
Marco is ready to rumble! He’s joined, what I call the secret “Bush” revenge war on Trump, with the other, “Russia is our biggest enemy!” jovial loudmouths, John McCain and his best bud Lindsey Graham.
But wait…I’m confused here. All the Democrats, led by Obama, and the black caucus are on the same side as McCain, Rubio and Graham?
What’s going on here?
How come Rino’s are joining up with Democrats in this new, “From Russia With Love” fantasy of danger and suspense? They are all making a big ruckus about Putin and how he is going to take over the world. Ignoring completely the Muslim Elephant in the room.
And does this all come down to Saudi Arabian oil? After all, Obama’s Muslim leader of the CIA, Director Brennan, was out warning that Trump knew nothing about Russia today. Should HE know the Russians? He spent half his life living in Saudi Arabia.
Or is this all about the vast military complex that Eisenhower warned us about in his last speech to the country? (BINGO!) 
Both Trump and Putin think NATO should be…revamped. Trump— because we foot the whole bill while the other countries are feeding the mouths of millions of Muslim immigrants, and being able to take long socialist vacations,—- and Putin, because he’s in competition with the Saudi’s for selling his oil, and he would love to take over more lands.
That’s what dictators do! Look at Obama, he just took over half the land of the Western Half of the country. (What?)
There are a LOT of big jobs in NATO, and what have they done for anybody lately? And since Obama crapped all over Israel, isn’t Israel a country we are sworn to protect?
Obama sure didn’t step up for that, did he? So, the U.N. Trumps NATO?
Today, Rubio said this:
Monday in Miami after attending a Martin Luther King Day event, while commenting on President-elect Donald Trump saying NATO is obsolete, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said NATO was “not only not obsolete I believe it’s as important as it’s been since the end of the Cold War.
I’m not sure. But…some golfers did see John McCain today, after the Miami Rally….
Maybe Little Marco should think more about the dangerous dinosaurs in Congress then worrying about Russia.
But then again…Nobody’s Perfect.
Little Marco…Wants WAR….With Russia.
Nobody Wins
I watched this today, and realized, as I watched the anger and shaking hands of Marco Rubio during the questioning of Rex Tillerson, that this is ONE man who should never be in the Oval Office.
He was unhinged. Too emotional. Rubio would go to war with Russia in a heartbeat.
Hey, where was Rubio during the Rwanda massacre? And by the way Marco, the Clintons MAY have murdered up to 60 people if you want to read the news.
Dick Morris today, admitted, that the CIA could be going rogue, as they once did. He said that LBJ could have had Kennedy killed. If they go rouge, it will be dangerous for Trump.
My heart went out to Mr. Tillerson, who answered wisely, and with finesse, and I bet he was thinking, “This is just a boy, and just think what I have to go through for this job.”
We saw this anger against Russia by mostly the Republican Party throughout the year: in fact, you could almost see who was being ruled by the global Cartel: The Clintons, the Bushes, McCain, and Graham. Mitt Romney thought Russia was our shown enemy.
If that is the case, then why piss them off?
McCain, today, admitted that he was the one who gave the CIA this nonsense about Trump watching prostitutes pee on a bed where Obama had slept in Russia.
Come on. How stupid ARE these people? They put the fact that Trump wanted to pee on Obama’s bed? Right there you know it’s fake.
The American people think that Trump and Putin will get along. Neither want war. So, WHY in the hell are the democrats and the republicans trying to start-up the cold war again?
Tell me Rubio…are the deaths of citizens in a foreign nation worth the death of millions here in the United States?
Anyway…here’s some excerpts from Michael Savage’s views on the Russian situation, and its history, which explains a lot….. at the end of his excellent book:
Stop the Coming Civil War.
Let me make it clear from the start: It was the United States, and not Russia, that engineered the uprising against the elected Ukrainian government. The Obama administration spent billions to enable radical right wingers to stage a phony revolution in Ukraine., then complained when Putin stepped in and draw a real red line in the sand, daring the United States to challenge him.
The legitimately elected Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovich was ousted and the country placed in the hands of rebel forces spearheaded by Chechen Islamist radicals.
The Ukrainian “revolution” was fostered and encouraged by Nulan, Rice, and U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt. Over the weeks leading to the February 2014 uprising, these three were instrumental in staging a destabilizing camping. Working with Ukrainian rebels they fostered the Ukrainian uprising that cause Yanukovich to flee from Kiev.
Arizona senator John McCain was also part of this duplicity. McCain went to Kiev in December 2014 and helped incite the mobs who would ultimately overthrow the legitimately elected president. If there were such a thing as a Nobel Anti-peace Prize, McCain would win it hands down for his work in Egypt and Syria, topped off by what he’s done in Ukraine. McCain was proposing nothing less than that we stag a military intervention in Ukraine, as he’s done many times before. McCain was in Syria, secretly baking rebels there, rebels who turned out to be Islamist radicals, supposedly our sworn enemies. McCain also made a covert trip to Libya, where he received an award from the military. This happened on the very day Shariah law was declared in that country, the same day McCain arrived. While he was in Ukraine, he met with a number of rebels who were intent on regime change in that country, and he expressed regret that he wasn’t having success saying “I do not see a military option and it’s tragic.
The Ukrainian nationalists are fascists. Washington’s original purpose for staging a coup in Ukraine was to move Ukraine away from Russia and bring Ukraine into the EU. In other words, the neocons and the bought-and-paid-for moderates in the Obama administration wanted to wrest control of Ukraine from Putin’s hands and gain economic and energy control over the country. As one commentator has pointed out, Western nations, with the United States leading the way, have been provoking Putin for decades. We’ve expanded NATO to include former Soviet states, Ukraine, looks like the next target and we’ve attacked allies of Russia, including Libya and Iraq. The United States, along with other Western nations, through our incursions into the politics, economics and national security of Russia and several of its allies, has effectively caused the situation that resulted in Putin stand ready to invade Ukraine militarily if necessary.
Putin has been good to the Russian Jews. With the elected government now driven out of Ukraine, the anti-Semitic U.S. Backed fascist thugs who have assumed control are vandalizing synagogues and threatening the lives of Jews in Ukraine.
Let me give you some background that will help you understand what went on in Russia, Ukraine, and Crimea after the fall of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. After Ukraine achieved independence and Crimean we ceded to Ukraine, state-owned assets of the Soviet Upon were privatized. This is where the term oligarchs, which you hear used so often in discussions about the Ukrainian conflict, comes into play. Those state-owned business and utilities were transferred into the hands of a small group of powerful, politically connected individuals, who effectively took control of Russia’s economy. Russia became a capitalist country in one sense of the word, but the private ownership of the country’s assets was transferred to a small group of cronies who quickly became among the richest and most powerful businessmen in the world. The Russian oligarchs continue in that role today.
Russian’s annexation of Crimea is also important relative to Ukraine. The majority population in Crimea is Russian, and its warm water Black Sea ports are critical to Russian military and trade interests. (Nobody adds, it’s also the bread basket)Russia could not afford to let the Crimean region fall into the hands of the insurgents who have taken over Ukraine, something Obama and his foreign policy know-nothings seem not to have anticipated.
U.S interference in Ukrainians political has resulted in Putin’s expanding his military influence, while at the same time Barack Obama is bent on decimating our military in the middle of the Ukrainian crisis.
I see the forces of the left are attempting nothing less than a socialist takeover of the world economy and global politics.
Why do Republican Party leaders cave again and again to Obama’s agenda?
The answer is actually very simple.
They are on his side.
Most Republicans now agree that we should become members of the “global community.” It’s not a coincidence that the phrase ‘global community” is synonymous with the word communism, or that Barack Obama got his start as a community organizer.
Communism has never been anything but a group of power-crazed leftist bent on depriving the citizens under their control of all their rights.
Like every communist country, we’ve become a surveillance state in which the NSA can trap our every move.
How did an unknown senator from Illinois become president of the United Stats?
How did an unknown cardinal, the first non-European in 1400 years and from a country with a Marxist history, become Pope?
How did an avowed Sandinista supporter with strong socialist leaning become mayor of the largest city in America?
Is this a sign of the times? Or is it something more sinister?
Ann Coulter: Explains Rubio’s Stance on Immigration
Nobody Cares
Slowly the pundits are jumping the Jeb Bush Titanic ship of fools….including the man who was in charge of his campaign. (By the way, has anybody else noticed that Dana Perino sort of disappeared?) So, the ‘money’ people are eyeing Rubio, who is young, handsome, and determined to beat Lindsay Graham in the “I’ll be the greatest Commander-In Chief” contest.
There’s something pretty scary about a man raised in a bar fighting the Chinese, Russia, and ISIS. I just can’t picture Lindsey NOT crying if we are attacked. Putin will take off his shirt, and Lindsey, would probably go have a beer. Hillary would bring another push button. Rubio, what would Rubio do? Give a long speech and probably give himself a year to consider his options.
Rubio was one of the “Gang of Eight” that was going to help out Obama in his quest for more democratic voters, which Ted Cruz just reminded Fox commentator Bret Baier— he stopped dead in its track. Don’t tell TED he never accomplishes anything.
From Adios America!(Ann Coulter, p.42-43)
Marco Rubio went on a worldwide tour swearing that his “comprehensive immigration reform” absolutely insisted on “enforcement first.” Then the bill was unveiled and it said:
Step one: Everyone who is here is legal.
Step two: After they’re amnestied, they can bring in all their relatives.
When would the enforcement part of Rubio’s “Enforcement First!” plan have kicked in? Answer: Never. As Rubio said on Fox News Sunday. “Basically, Homeland Security will have five years to meet that goal. If after five years Homeland Security has not met that number, it will trigger the Border Commission, who will then take over this issue for them.” So if the Department of Homeland Security failed to secure the border, ANOTHER GOVERNMENT COMMISSION WOULD BE CREATED! (That always works, said the Department of Education.) And if the second commission failed, Rubio would personally write a strongly worded letter. Would the 11 million illegal’s already legalized lose that status if the border remained wide open? Of course not. Refer to Step One. But the bill sure would have spent a lot of taxpayer money.
I love Ann Coulter.
Now, if Rubio said that he has changed his attitude, would you trust it?
Can YOU say….Adios America? I’m counting on Ted Cruz and Donald Trump to take him out…and I’m sure, Ann Coulter will be down at the border helping them.
Amnesty: WTF Are They Thinking?!
Nobody’s Opinion:
Hey…whatever happened to Kim Jung Un? What did we hear about for weeks upon end just last month? Everyone was asking, since he dare not start a nuclear war with the United States, how was he going to back out gracefully? Every single day he threatened us.
As we all know, Obama is not very good with taking care of foreign crisis’, so when the Boston Marathon bombing happened, all eyes were turned off Kim Jung Un and onto the tragedy of a bunch of people getting their legs blown off on a sunny day by two college boys.
While this news was good for Kim Jung Uno, the bombing wasn’t so good for Obama’s favorite subject at the moment: amnesty.
The best summation of the amnesty bill that I found was this article written by one of my favorite fighters: Phyllis Schlafly, who so often gets it right, so of course, she is not put up in the mainstream or even mentioned by Rush Limbaugh or Bill O’Reilly, or any of the big boys. That’s why I am showing her off here. 
Here’s part of her column here:
The amnesty proposal cooked up by six Senators who claim to be bipartisan is essentially the same plan that aroused the fury of the grassroots in 2007 and covered Congressmen with a tsunami of messages. However, this time we know the cost, and that’s truly scary. Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation estimates that this amnesty plan will cost the U.S. taxpayers “$2.5 Trillion above any taxes paid in” because the majority of illegal aliens who would eventually be legalized by the proposal are uneducated and poor. At least 60% are high school dropouts so they live below the poverty level and will be eligible to receive many of our 79 varieties of welfare handouts. What they may pay in income taxes will be nullified by the cash refunds known as Earned Income Tax Credit. The entire plan should be illegal because it violates a federal law that anyone granted entry into the U.S. must be financially self-supporting and not likely to become a public charge.
She goes and reminds us that Hugo Chavez would be against this bill:
Chavez was vehemently opposed to illegal’s coming across the Mexican border because they took jobs from legal immigrants. He ordered union members to call the Immigration and Naturalization Service and report illegals working in the fields so our government could deport them. Chavez got his supporters to picket INS offices to demand a crackdown on illegals, and he offered staff to the INS to serve as volunteer border guards to keep Mexicans from sneaking into the U.S.
One in three immigrant-headed households already participates in at least one major welfare program. Green card holders are already eligible for Medicaid, TANF, Supplemental Security Income, child care assistance, food stamps, and a variety of other welfare benefits and public aid programs.
In other words: Are we nuts?
There is no doubt that this bill, along with Obamacare will break the American dream, probably forever.
Americans should get just as mad about this as they did about gun control, but as Phyllis says; they are all using the “Christian” card, using the guilt card to put your own noose around your own neck.
Rubio is out front on this. Nobody Thinks he will be on the ticket with Jeb Bush in 2016. Both parties just want the votes of the illegals. They don’t care about the American citizen anymore, or the American dream.
It’s pretty clear.
Read her excellent piece, Amnesty=Suicide for Republican Party.
CPAC 2013: Nobody’s Got the Top of the Rhino’s Enemy List….
Nobody’s Opinion
This year’s CPAC was full of surprises. Every year, the candidate who won the straw poll, usually went on to win the nomination for the party, but this year, Karl Rove has his work cut out for him–it was the libertarian Rand Paul who won—Marco Rubio came in second, probably due to the fact that Ann Coulter ripped him to shreds about his immigration issues. As great as Rubio is: he is on board with amnesty, which would make him a good VP for Jeb Bush, and as Ann pointed out, you get amnesty, you get democrats forever more.
I bet Rubio didn’t see that coming. Nobody can steamroll you like Ann.
Already this morning Karl Rove was on some talk show, telling everyone that Rand Paul just got lucky and took a propitious moment doing the filibuster, because Eric Holder screwed up by not answering his questions on drones, and he ran with it. Karl thought it was smart, but then he went on another one of his famous Rove attacks. Why, nobody knows that Rand Paul would have arrested Anwar Al-Awlaki instead of killing him with a drone. Americans, don’t know how bad Rand Paul would be on protecting us.
(Gee Karl, George W. Bush, did a bang up job with that “protection” stuff. Have you talked to any 9/11 widows lately? )
I’ve heard Rand Paul talk about this incident, and he has said time and again that he is not against using drones in a war zone..but when the 16-year-old, Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki, was also killed in the attack, Jay Carney had this to say about it, and Rand Paul didn’t like it much:
“I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the well being of their children. I don’t think becoming an al Qaeda jihadist terrorist is the best way to go about doing your business.”
I listened to the speakers most of the day while I was cleaning my house.. all of them were good, some were boring. The crowd to me looked very small, and you have to wonder how much it costs to go there, rent a hotel, buy tickets…I know I couldn’t afford it. Republicans don’t bus people in.
Sarah Palin was amazing in her speech and form. She is becoming adept at being a great speaker, and no doubt will make most of her living off of it. She mixed the Big Gulp with the “I got the rack” joke. She was a real hit, but did she put her name in the straw poll?
No. Sarah has no intention of running. And then, after Sarah, came my favorite, Phyllis Schlafly, the grand old lady…walking slow, proud, she almost reminded me of the great Ronald Reagan. I first learned about her through Ann Coulter. To me, this woman is right up there with Margaret Thatcher. No, she never ran for office, but she has done great things for America…
Listen to this speech, it’s a winner! (start at 1.35 and skip the jokes if you like.)
Like the great Ronald Reagan, Mrs. Schlafly is a real fighter, and like Reagan she speaks with a clear, voice of reason.
She, more than anybody there…had it right. (In my Nobody Opinion)
There IS a fight for the heart and soul of the Republican party right now. This last loss was worst than the rest and Phyllis Schlafly hit the Rhino’s where it hurts. It’s probably the reason you can’t find her speech on YouTube. (I couldn’t.)
She called every one of the Republican nominees in the last decade a “bunch of losers.” And then she pointed out, who is keeping those losers at the top. Karl Rove.
“We need to have the grass roots take over these bunch of losers.”
And if there is an Rhino enemy list: in my mind, Karl Rove is right at the top, . Now, when I see Karl Rove on TV, I turn Fox off. If we all did that, sooner or later FOX would get him off of there. According to Phyllis, Karl had 400 millions to spend, on 31 candidates and he only won 7 races.
If CNN and MSNBC, are working for the Democrats, FOX has way too much time given to Karl Rove, who basically lost the last election for us. I don’t think he wanted Romney to win. If he comes out promoting Jeb Bush, then odds are, Romney’s loss was no big deal to him.
Of course the libs are already making fun of CPAC. One guy said it was as if he was watching some old outdated Moose lodge fraternity meeting. And really, that’s how they defeat us. The main points everyone made throughout the day was none of them were good at getting the message across.
The real problem is: The Republican message is very weak.
Will Karl Rove be able to bring down Rand Paul….after all, he’s already started with attacks?
Nobody Suggests: We give Rand some help. I have been blaming George W. Bush for Obama being elected: It seems, I have been blaming the wrong person: It’s Karl Rove we need to get rid of.






