We Are Going to Need MILLIONS of Davids’
Nobody’s Opinion
“Some even believe we are a part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.”
– David Rockefeller from his book, David Rockefeller: Memoirs.
*****
“We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”
– James Warburg (Rothschild Banking Agent 1950)
*****
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” – David Rockefeller
Are you ready to rumble? Are you ready for the New World Order? Yeah, me either.
I watched an excellent educational program on the History Channel last weekend called, “The Men Who Built America.” It was all about John Rockefeller, Dale Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan. They were the ‘titans’ of capitalism, and they created the biggest monopolies on the planet—-but they did build the country. They were ruthless in their business, and it was all about winning, being the richest, having the most monopolies—-and they competed against each other with almost malevolent passion. But it was competition that helped build the America we know: Rockefeller’s gas, J.P. Morgan’s electric, and Carnegie steel.
And the word here to remember is— America. 
Under these men, the workers worked for pittances. During the Industrial revolution, men worked long hours, lived in poverty, and the gap between the rich and the poor was great.
Then along came Henry Ford. He gave his men higher wages, decent hours, the assembly line, and bought the age of prosperity to America. He wisely knew that the more cars he sold the better it was for everybody. While the titans of Rockefeller and Carnegie believed in crushing all competition, Ford thought competitions was a good thing. Pretty soon, all the companies were copying his model of business. The middle class was built. The 20th century was America’s glory.
And then, Teddy Roosevelt, a man that all three of the Titans were afraid of, became President, and government actually broke up Standard Oil into many companies— but Rockefeller had shares in every single company that Standard Oil was split into and became even richer.
J.P. Morgan had so much money, he once bailed out the government..thus forever bonding Wall Street and the government to serve each other forever.
And if you don’t think the Wall Street of today, rules the country, all you have to remember is how President George W. Bush bailed out Wall Street. (With OUR money)
No wonder Wall Street wants Jeb to succeed Obama.
I was surprised (although not shocked ) to learn that while the three titans of old fought and did horrible things to each other in business, that didn’t stop them from working together to buy an American Presidents. They just did it. They planned it out, than each gave millions to William McKinley and he won. He left them alone. Rockefeller even went over McKinley’s speeches.
You don’t have to be smart to realized, that our Presidents, and our Congress are still elected by power and money. They decide WHO goes on the tickets…whenever possible.That’s called, sorry to report: A plutocracy.
We have Oligarchs too.
Now we are in the 21st century, and we find ourselves back in the same hole we were before. The gap between the rich and poor grows bigger every day. We have two economies, the stock market where the rich play their global stocks, and the ‘service’ economy, where the disappearing middle class exists. American manufacturing has been transferred to other countries, like China. Whether our Titians moved their companies because of the high taxes or because they just see a bigger market, hardly matters to the us now. But in the 21st century we have 500 titans, instead of 3, and if the 20th century was all about America, the 21st is not about America at all.
It’s about global multinational companies and their dividends.
It’s why Bush was always warning us about isolationism, and Obama is shocked that Putin is actually working for his country. Nationalism is not supported by ANY of the big 500 countries. Their plans are to get into those countries and make money. They like to think they are building a better world, but it’s obvious what they have done.
They have REALLY screwed it up. There may be more “middle’ class in China, but it’s still a communist country. And they like communism. They really do. It’s much better for the bottom line. All you need to buy off is one man, instead of hundreds. It saves money. 
Our modern day J.P. Morgan was Mitt Romney and he really was no different than Obama on policy. He believed in cap and trade, amnesty, abortion rights, and universal health care. The only difference was he was a money guy. Obama only knows how to spend money, not make it. But if debt is a prerequisite for the New World Order, than Obama was the perfect pick:
“The one aim of these financiers is world control by the creation of inextinguishable debts.” – Henry Ford, Industry Giant
So, you and I , the ones who don’t WANT to become global citizens, are slowly being programmed. The politicians are so much in the global multinational pockets that they got the Supreme Court to pass that “companies are people” who have a right to your property, but maybe not people enough to not obey Obamacare…because universal healthcare is the globalists (which are liberals and rinos’ ) agenda. (Watch carefully what happens to Hobby Lobby.)
That’s why the Rino’s won’t ever repeal it. That’s why BOTH parties said Ted Cruz shut down the government. He didn’t…THEY did. But look how they can twist the truth.
That’s why patriotic American “nationalists” are attacked by both parties. It’s been on the agenda for a looooooooooog time. American, has to be downsized. The New World Order is NOT a conspiracy.
Don’t believe me? Read their quotes here. Don’t be a fool, these men are working behind the scenes to bring this about. But unlike Rockefeller and Carnegie, who spent their own money, these titans are using our money to build it.
That’s why they need an internet tax, and a cap and trade tax. They want to keep their vast fortunes.
The NSA is just enough about multinational spying, as government spying. ( I don’t believe them when they say they don’t do it, do you?) We have blurred into an almost obscene fascism, where information is sold by the internet companies on where you shop, and the government sells YOUR information to the companies.
America is being transformed to fit into their global corporate government, where only the individual who works for the company will get his ideas on the market. All patents must be owned by the monopoly.
In the mean time, so we don’t get what’s up…they keep our eyes on the lost Boeing 777.
It’s lost. Or was it shot down? Or is it in a bunker? There is so much misinformation about it all, what can any of us believe?
While I’m pretty depressed tonight about the future of our country, I do know one thing…history has shown that even in the darkest hours, some do rise up, and miracles do happen.
Can David’s beat the Goliaths of the world? Yep.
But…this time, we may need more than one David.
“I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Government, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship – and those plans are there!” – Congressman Ron Paul at an event near Austin, Texas on August 30th, 2003
In Defense of the Big American Bone
Or— Those With Big Bones, Hide Them NOW!
Nobody’s Opinion
She’s Italian, she was raised Catholic, and she fits right into what I was going to talk about today. Her name is Liz Trotta. She is a contributing commentator on Fox News, and this morning her subject was…the Pope. People should stop picking on him, especially Rush Limbaugh, she said. She went on: Just because the Pope said that he knew and liked a lot of Marxists, doesn’t mean that he likes Marxism.
According to MS Trotta, the Pope sees the great misery and poverty in the world, and he is just doing what Jesus would do, what we all should do—- be concerned about the little children of this world growing up in poverty. (It’s the new progressive argument.)
I had just read a piece from Charles Krauthammer’s new book, “Things that Matter” called, The Mirror-Image Fallacy, (Time, Aug., 1983) in which the good psychiatrist explains the progressive concept of Solipsism, which says that everyone in the world is alike.
“Fundamentally, it is a radical denial of the otherness of others.” said Charles.
This philosophy —everyone in the world is the same, because we all sleep, drink, feel pain, get common colds etc, and therefore utopia could be reached if we just got the right system in place—is crazy. Nobody needs to suffer, they believe.
I hate to say this, but sometimes it’s what people leave OUT of their talking points that can really get you pissed off. (Obama does this every day.) In Liz’s great defense of the Pope, she forgot to mention that the Pope WAS attacking capitalism. Sorry Liz, that quite a big point to leave out.
h/t The Exchange:
The pope has gone a bit overboard, however, in his recent attack on free-market capitalism. In a lengthy “apostolic exhortation,” Pope Francis rails against “an economy of exclusion” and a “ financial system which rules rather than serves.” The pope points out that, in a time of miraculous technological progress, alarming numbers of people still live in misery and desperation.
“The culture of prosperity deadens us,” the pope writes. “We are thrilled if the market offers us something new to purchase; and in the meantime all those lives stunted for lack of opportunity seem a mere spectacle; they fail to move us.”
The pope has urged everyone from charities to Italian authorities “to do everything possible so that every family can have a house.” this holiday season.
Great idea! Hey, that Vatican is pretty big— just THINK of how many homeless families you could fit in that sucker.
According to the Pope, and the progressives, the only way to rectify this horrible injustice of people who have nothing, is to redistribute the bones…I mean the money, by force if we must. Both Obama, and now the Pope, and quite a few members of Congress are ready to implement…equality upon the world. Obamacare is just the start.
(John McCain would add the Ukraine, Japan, North Korea, the Sudan, Syria…..Mercury, the planet Venus…)
The world leaders are desperate in their compassion, are they not? Even Liz today was full of it. I was looking for the picture of the poor starving children walking barefoot in Rio to pop up behind her.
To the progressives, the only way to bring utopia to the earth is to take a bone from one dog, and give it to the other dog. Anybody who has dogs knows there WILL be a fight. Even the sweetest dog on the planet will bare her teeth and growl, protect that bone, even hide it, from the other dog. That is her bone, and NOBODY has a right to it. This happens every single morning in my house.
It’s dog survival 101.
And everybody knows the best way to lift people out of poverty is to let the people run their own lives, in free markets, without government interfering, and collect as many bones as they possible can. And that’s true capitalism. That was once the American Dream.
My subject today was going to be when did America stop believing in individual success? When did the American Dream turn into— America is greedy, selfish, and rich?
When did the man become less important than the collective? Even in sports, it’s the home-run that wins the games. While the collective can win at many things, true progress is made, in almost every instance, by the individual with a little help from his friends.
(Thank you Ringo)
I know when it happened in my life. The social conditioning started in 1st grade. If one bully hits a kid, and the kid sticks up for himself, BOTH kids are sent to the office. What can of justice is that? There is no justice.
It’s all about teaching that the children must obey and do what’s best for the collective.
If a bully in class damages something while the teacher is gone, and nobody in the class is willing to be beat up by the bully, they remain silent. The whole class will be punished for one man’s crime. I believe this is done in the military too.
Nobody Thinks the very insanity of blaming millions of white people now, for crimes of their ancestors of long ago, is no different than punishing the whole class for crimes none of them committed. We are…forever being conditioned to guilt. And the Catholics and politicians, are masters at it.
It’s one of the reasons a whole race of white people are silent now on the injustices being propelled on them, for crimes they didn’t even commit.
So I ask myself: Will America put up a fight for her bones, the biggest one being freedom and the right of the individual to decide his own fate? 
And why should such an intelligent woman such as Liz Trotta, ignore the obvious?. Has she no clue that she is suggesting we all stop buying I-Phones and start giving our money to countries all over the world?
( I don’t have an I Phone, but the black guy who just came over to fix my internet connection had two, which he got the old-fashioned way. He worked for them.)
Liz Trotta, we perhaps could say, is just a product of her Catholic upbringing, which never told her, there isn’t enough bones in the world to fix poverty, and who never pointed out to her, that politicians will go farther than a dog for their right to keep their bones: They hide them in offshore bank accounts while they take ours, which Nobody Thinks is an injustice we have been conditioned to accept.
And speaking of dogs: Today, Raul Castro issued a stern warning to entrepreneurs to not push the boundaries of the state. Nobody is to collect too many bones in Cuba..he is adamant.
The Pope would no doubt, find Castro very friendly, because Castro, has a house for all his people, even if they all leak.
I just hope our American doggie survival instincts kick in before it’s too late…and if not, we can always go back to the old Jesse James’ method.
You dig a BIG hole….
Communism, Capitalism, and the Sweet Ism Sound of Sucking…
Nobody’s Opinion
Well, bust my plastic buttons: The Pope is complaining about capitalism.
Pope Francis has used his first major written work to attack capitalism as a “new tyranny,” while urging global leaders to fight poverty and inequality. In a document published Tuesday, Pope Francis denounced the ‘idolatry of money’ and “trickle-down” economic policies, as well as consumerism and a financial system which he says rules rather than serves. The Pope urged politicians to guarantee all citizens “dignified work, education and healthcare.”
This coming from a guy who gets money from the poor and lives in a house which has the biggest collection of art in the world, and probably has his own foot massager. I love a good hypocrite. Gee…another con job. And I thought this guy was going to be the real deal. (sigh)
I side with Mr. Adams who found the Catholic Church full of that very same ‘tyranny.” The Catholic people are poor, but the Vatican is not suffering. Maybe the Pope should practice what he preaches and sell off those Bernini’s so that Peru can have free health care.
I was thinking about the rich today, because I was reading about that very big capitalist, Ross Perot, in Forbes magazine.
True Confession: I voted for Ross Perot…twice. It was said that Ross was the reason Daddy Bush lost to Bill Clinton, and so, the Clinton’s will make sure that some third-party libertarian will run against whomever runs against Hillary, to assure her election, because that worked so well with Bill. It’s all getting rather boring and predictable, isn’t it? Having our Presidents picked years in advance?
The reason I like Perot so much, is that he kept trying to warn everyone about NAFTA, and CAFTA. What he called the sucking sound of America losing its jobs to other countries.
I really don’t think Perot is suffering after his defeat, and neither is Mitt Romney, because they are both what the Pope is talking about: capitalists— In fact, there is one thing both Ross and Mitt have in common: They know how to get the government to fund their big money-making projects and they use that free money from the taxpayers to further their empires.
From “Love That Giant Sucking Sound”, Christopher Helman, Forbes Magazine, Sept., 2013:
The Federal Aviation Administration came to the Perots (in Texas) says Perot Jr., “and asked us to donate land for an airport,” an industrial airport to be built with public funds.
Perot like the idea–and saw a greater opportunity. He convinced Fort Worth Mayor Bob Bolen and the city council of his grand plan. Perot would put up the land for the airport but only if Fort Worth agreed to pay for utilities and infrastructure, allow Perot to operate the airport and promise future tax abatements so he could lure in companies and develop yet more of his land.
Why settle for just an airport?
And this is how it works all over the United States: The billionaires get the ‘people’ to pay for the football stadiums, and malls, and on and on and their property taxes go up, and while jobs ARE created, the bulk of the money goes to….the billionaires.
Why do you think there are more than 500 big B’s on the Forbes lists? And when the Supreme Court gave big companies “personhood”, you have the mom and pop small business up against the Wal-marts. (I understand where the Pope is coming from, but he just doesn’t get it does he?)
The Perot airport has become the main industrial hub for the lower United States. Sharon Boyd, who tried to stop Perot getting public financing had this to say:
“He’s the ultimate welfare baby. He doesn’t do anything without subsides or tax rebates. He has a mentality that views the public sector as a fat pig that’s going to be slaughter anyway, so it might as well be by us.”
So…here’s where maybe somebody should get the Pope aside and ask him: You, dear sir, can fly all over the world BECAUSE men like Ross Perot build airports for your plane to land upon. Maybe you should think about that next time you take a tour.
Is it any wonder the Pope is complaining? Mom and Pop just don’t have the money any more to fork over to the church. Instead of blaming governments for giving handouts and sweet deals to billionaires friends, he is campaigning for communism. Think about that….Communism and the Church.
Talk about a great sucking sound…put those two together and the wall of China might get sucked up into the Vatican overnight.
I can’t wait. Where’s my straw?
Nobody Remembers the Common Course
Nobody Remembers—-
Thanksgiving is coming up…and every Thanksgiving, Rush Limbaugh tells the story of how the first people in the colonies were made to all work for the ‘company.’ In other words, they had to throw everything they grew into the pot to be spread around. And then Rush loves to explain–the real reason they could celebrate Thanksgiving: They switched to every man for himself, which was a precursor to…Adam Smith, and 349,000 golf courses! (just kidding.) —-capitalism.
So I thought, since I’m reading about early American history right now, I’d throw in some more of William Bradford’s own observations to best explain, WHY free enterprise works better than ‘communism’. What seems so cut and clear to many of us, has eluded our leaders.
Remember—-The first people in Plymouth were literally starving. selling their clothes, working for the Indians, eating nuts, crawling around on all fours looking for food…and according to Bradford —
“One, in gathering shellfish, was so weak as he stuck fast in the mud and was found dead in the
place.”
So…they, being sensible people thought: Well…THIS isn’t working, and they changed the “experiment’…and the good William tells us how—
Enjoy…because REAL history, is being destroyed.
From “The Annals of America, Vol. One”
End of the “Common Course and Condition.”
All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still languish in misery.
At length, after much debate of things, the governor (with the advice of the chief among them) gave way that they should set corn, every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves: in all other things to go on in the general way as before. And so was assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportions of their number, for that end, only for present use and ranged all the boys and youth under some family. (Nobody notes: orphans)
This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the governor or any other could use, and saved them a great deal of trouble and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn, which before would allege weakness and inability, whom to have completed would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.
(Some of those women are still here. ) Remember—-Before they thought of getting rid of the redistribution system…people weren’t so happy:
The young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work of other men’s’ wives and children without any recompense. The strong or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the others could: this was thought injustice. The aged and the graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors and victuals, clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for men’s’ wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc. they deemed it a kind of slavery: neither could many husband well brook it.
God in his wisdom saw another course fitter for them.
******
God evidently has not touched his ‘wisdom’ on Barack Obama. People now…are getting tired of paying for the vast fraud and abuse that the welfare system is doling out to minorities, and illegal’s. We are no different from our ancestors.
And Obamacare, is the next great injustice. You would THINK they would learn from history.
But no.
Later on, when families started coming over, the governors gave them more land, and people got to keep their land, and without that nice little perk, we might never have had George Washington as our first President, because one of the big reasons he fought the British was for the rights to keep, and own his own property. (George had a LOT of land) Owning your own property was something which had already been established and enjoyed by King George’s subjects since Plymouth. The Crown wanted only loyalists to be able to own land. That’s like Obama telling everyone that only Congress can have their own medical insurance.
Nobody Thinks we need to remember the common course. It’s the tract to starvation, Detroit, more socialism, and in the end, death.
Nobody’s Note: On Bradford’s death, the historical manuscript was lost and disappeared from the colonies during the revolutionary war, but came to light in the library of the Bishop of London in 1855. The original manuscript was returned to the U.S. in 1897 and now lies in view at the State House in Boston.
(Maybe Debbie has seen it.)
Nobody Flashes Aldous Huxley
Nobody Flashes:
I was cleaning out some old paperbacks from a closet this morning when I found my college copy of Brave New World Revisited by the Brit, Aldous Huxley. For those of you who have never heard of the man, George Orwell was his student.
On 21 October 1949, Huxley wrote to George Orwell, author of Nineteen Eighty-Four, congratulating him on “how fine and how profoundly important the book is”. In his letter to Orwell, he predicted:
Within the next generation I believe that the world’s leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience.[14]
Huxley had deeply felt apprehensions about the future the developed world might make for itself. From these he put forward some warnings in his writings and talks. In a 1958 televised interview conducted by journalist Mike Wallace, Huxley outlined several major concerns: the difficulties and dangers of world overpopulation; the tendency toward distinctly hierarchical social organization; the crucial importance of evaluating the use of technology in mass societies susceptible to wily persuasion; the tendency to promote modern politicians, to a naive public, as well-marketed commodities.
And in the introduction of the piece, he said this remarkable thing back in 1965:
Whenever the economic life of a nation becomes precarious, the central government is forced to assume additional responsibilities for the general welfare. It must work out elaborate plans for dealing with a critical situation; it must impose ever greater restrictions upon the activities of its subjects; and if, as if very likely, worsening economic conditions results in political unrest, or open rebellion, the central government must intervene to preserve public order and its own authority. More and more power is thus concentrated in the hands of the executive and their bureaucratic managers. But the nature of power is such that even those who have not sought it, but have had it force upon them, tend to acquire a taste for more.
Huxley went on to say that when overpopulation becomes the norm, communism is a sure thing.
And so Nobody Thinks that our elites, who have studied at Harvard and Yale, are very aware of Aldous Huxley, and so you have to ask yourself;
Why in the world are our elites inviting the whole world to come to America?
According to Aldous Huxley, that way is sure communism.
I might have to read this book again.
Remembering Our Presidents
Nobody Remembers
Once again, the timing of the dedication of x-President, George W. Bush’s library, couldn’t have had come at a more propitious time. The nation had just been attacked by Muslim radicals, giving the Bush family a platform to remind us all, that Bush kept us safe throughout the rest of his Presidency after 9/11. And in this light, it was okay for George himself to push for another Bush in the White House: His brother, Jeb.
As I watched the former Presidents all standing, and then the speeches, I can’t say that any one of them talked about what THEY had done for our country. It was all about how they, while doing the ‘toughest’ job in the world…changed the world, and plan to keep on doing it.
Not much about helping America. No mention of the hard times we are going through now.
I posted Jimmy Carter’s speech, simply because to me, what all of the former Presidents seem to be most proud about is what they have accomplished in other countries. That’s all they bragged about in all their speeches. According to the former Presidents, Bush’s best legacy was his work on aids in Africa. Clinton, Carter, and Obama all mentioned it.
George W. himself continued his great theme of globalization. America’s future is to spread democracy around the world. Never mind that since Bush and Obama, the trillions of American dollars spent to spread democracy around the world has not done a damn thing but strengthen more tyrants and America haters abroad, and destroyed the economy at home.
The theme of Bush’s library is freedom. But…while he dreams of spreading freedom all over the world, in America, the citizens continue to lose theirs.
The Bush doctrine is that only in freedom will democracy flourish, while true and noble….it makes no sense to a religion based on anything BUT freedom. All the children of Islam are brainwashed before they start to walk. I guess Bush thinks sometime 3,000 years from now, the world’s population of Muslims will decide to vote for someone who goes against everything they’ve learned from birth, and will thank George Bush for saving them from poverty and giving them democracy.
Frankly, I don’t see it happening.
Nobody Thinks that the reason all these Presidents have to praise themselves on how what they personally did to further and help the world is because none of them have down a damn thing to help Americans. All of them are too busy helping the rest of the world. Globalization may make good speeches and wonderful ideas for American Presidents who build multi-billion dollar museums to themselves and keep their own families working forever, but they all just become another part of the 1 percent that live among the rich and famous. The Presidential museums will be the last remaining things standing if we keep on this “We will fix the world” path.
George W. Bush comes off as a very sweet and likable man, but so does Bill Clinton. But, they were paid to work for America…not to eliminate poverty all over the world because it makes them feel better about themselves. (Or helps out big corporations who want into the global markets.) We must not judge Presidents on how much we like them as people, but on what they have done for us. And let’s be frank: None of them can be considered great.
So, when Bush started crying at the end of his speech— when he said the future of America will be great…a lot of us felt like crying with him. Everyone said he was crying because of all his friends. But to those watching, he was crying because America might never recover, and he knows it.
Personally, I don’t think Bush is that dumb.
Instead of talking about what they have all done for America, all they could talk about is how much money they sent out to the rest of the world. It’s enough to make you mad. And we still have good men dying in Afghanistan.
After the ceremony, I came across this video of Daniel Hannan, explaining how Margaret Thatcher took a dying England and brought it back to life. It’s what we need here. A President that takes care of his country: FIRST.
That’s what we should have heard today: George W. Bush could have brought America’s strength back. Instead, he choose his own course of “saving the world.”..and because he chose the wrong course, the communists, came forward.
George…you broke my heart.
You know, maybe our “Presidents” should just start building their libraries in Africa, and Iraq, and all over the world. And I apologize tonight to anyone who feels I’m too cynical about them all, because frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn about any of them.
And I will spend the rest of my life, trying NOT to remember the years I spent feeling betrayed, by each and every one of them.
Nobody Cares About the ‘Criminal-in-Chief’ Reaction to Boston
Nobody Cares
Like most Americans, I’ve been listening to wall-to-wall coverage of the bombings in Boston, and as usual, scouting the websites for varying opinions…from the Alex Jones version of “FBI maybe setup this action” to the ongoing almost nauseating coverage of how brave Bostonians are…as Carl Sagan so rightly points out in his books, it’s best to take most things, even politics with as much skepticism as possible: So here’s a few Nobody’s Opinions:
**********
1. The FBI we have found out, could have prevented this if they had listened to Russia, but what happened? Personally, I think, simply by listening to Obama’s own philosophy on Muslims in America and his reaction to the Ft. Hood shootings— it’s the Obama administration that is holding back the FBI from doing their job. When I reported suspicions in my own neighborhood, the Chief of Police was very protective of my Muslim neighbors and told me to leave. The FBI agent, on the other hand, took me seriously, and then told me short of my seeing them load a bomb into the back of their vans, there was absolutely nothing he could do about them. Hazelwood, the city I live in, is a very democratic stronghold.
2. Throughout Benghazi we saw Hillary Clinton and Obama make statement after statement condemning a video that insulted Islam. That held priory over the attack and murder of our own citizens. Even at the funerals, Hillary was telling the grieving relatives, “We will punish the man who made the video.” The White House has let the matter go.
3. Obama has had the Muslim Brotherhood welcomed into the White House for the first time in history. He has opened the visa’s once again for Muslims to flood into our country. He has given speeches about Islam being peaceful, and America being the biggest Muslim nation–his political correctness goes beyond sanity.
In other words, it is Obama that is putting America in danger. The facts all point to that.
4. While the lock down of Boston, by all logical reasoning, seemed very necessary, the precedent it sets is alarming. To have tanks, and big thugs carrying real machine guns— having all those forces roaming the city streets, and having a shoot-out right in the neighborhood, should leave Americans gasping. While we heard all the regular, “Our police and military are great!” speeches, is this the future? Every time some guy goes wacko our cities will be filled with tanks to ‘protect’ us?
When will the tanks be brought out in Chicago? And despite all the money, equipment, and technology, the person who found the guy was a lone citizen who made a simple phone call.
I don’t know how many soldiers, cops, and FBI were in Watertown, but I wonder if all the people of Watertown will give up their freedom to be protected by the vast military complex that the Democrats seem to enjoy.
Yes…the Democrats will bring out the big guns before the Republicans will. Funny isn’t it? No it’s not, when you know that it is their policy to disarm Americans, and let the state protect you.
Let’s not forget, Bill Clinton’s action in Waco, and Janet Reno sending in the military in the middle of the night to send a poor immigrant child back to Castro. Can you even imagine George Bush doing that?
If a Republican had ordered this massive buildup in Boston, or stealing a child in the night by gunpoint, the Democrats would have been screaming.
Clearly, we can assume that the Democrats have no qualms of building Obama’s army…to “protect” us all.
As for Alex Jones and others listening to the mother saying the boys were used by the FBI..that is absurd. Islam and even the moderates that are Muslims, believe that everyone who is an infidel should be killed. She, by all accounts was lying.
It IS in their religion. Nevertheless…just because Alex makes mistakes on some things, he is right about there being a big military presence right near the bombing sites and has video and witnesses to prove it.
That is a piece of the puzzle that we shouldn’t ignore just because it’s from Alex Jones. Alex Jones reminds me of Glenn Beck, who sometimes, often makes big mistakes too.
Both are good guys. Both have opinions. We should listen to them all.
Should we blame everything on the FBI, who even before 9/11 warned the administration about a possible attack? Something is very wrong.
Bill Clinton once airlifted 80,000 Bosnians (Muslims) into the St. Louis. They have not attacked anymore, and nobody goes into their neighborhoods, which are in the city.
They were on our local news. Saying they love it here. So..until proven otherwise, we can take them at their word even though I don’t like the fact that we paid for them to get here with no consent from anybody who lives here…just a President’s wish.
But my Muslim neighbors who came down from Detroit….they don’t like America.
If Obama keeps letting these people in, (as they came in during Clinton’s’ time) maybe we should start questioning the Democrat’s reason for looking the other way when jihadist are let into the country.
Maybe…we should be asking them “Why?’
Or the question should be…how do THEY benefit from this “turn the other cheek” policy? Does it come down to helping get us to disarm?
After Boston, we should be demanding more answers:
Obama said this after the last suspect was arrested:
And that’s why we take care not to rush to judgment — not about the motivations of these individuals; certainly not about entire groups of people.
To which most Americans go —-WTF? The motivation was on their YouTube videos!
Obama ignores the facts, and we should ask him…why.
Nobody Cares that the most condemning facts all point to Obama’s philosophy. He is starting to look like: the “Criminal In Chief.” One thing we do know: whatever a politician does usually benefits himself.
Obama wants a civilian army: Bigger than the military. He as said so. We should take him at his word. 






























